Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35277452›Full record

ArticleeNeuro

Reward-Dependent Selection of Feedback Gains Impacts Rapid Motor Decisions.

Antoine De Comite, Frédéric Crevecoeur, Philippe Lefèvre

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Antoine De ComiteInstitute of Information and Communication Technologies, Electronics and Applied mathematics (ICTEAM), Institute of Neuroscience (IoNS), Université catholique de Louvain, 1348 Louvain, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-3852-0402
Frédéric CrevecoeurInstitute of Information and Communication Technologies, Electronics and Applied mathematics (ICTEAM), Institute of Neuroscience (IoNS), Université catholique de Louvain, 1348 Louvain, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-1147-1153
Philippe LefèvreInstitute of Information and Communication Technologies, Electronics and Applied mathematics (ICTEAM), Institute of Neuroscience (IoNS), Université catholique de Louvain, 1348 Louvain, Belgium philippe.lefevre@uclouvain.be.ORCID 0000-0003-2032-3635

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Target reward influences motor planning strategies through modulation of movement vigor. Considering current theories of sensorimotor control suggesting that movement planning consists in selecting a goal-directed control strategy, we sought to investigate the influence of reward on feedback control. Here, we explored this question in three human reaching experiments. First, we altered the explicit reward associated with the goal target and found an overall increase in feedback gains for higher target rewards, highlighted by larger velocities, feedback responses to external loads, and background muscle activity. Then, we investigated whether the differences in target rewards across multiple goals impacted rapid motor decisions during movement. We observed idiosyncratic switching strategies dependent on both target rewards and, surprisingly, the feedback gains at perturbation onset: the more vigorous movements were less likely to switch to a new goal following perturbations. To gain further insight into a causal influence of the feedback gains on rapid motor decisions, we demonstrated that biasing the baseline activity and reflex gains by means of a background load evoked a larger proportion of target switches in the direction opposite to the background load associated with lower muscle activity. Together, our results demonstrate an impact of target reward on feedback control and highlight the competition between movement vigor and flexibility.

Indexed as

Psychomotor PerformanceRewardFeedbackHumansMotivationMovementdecision makingperturbationsreaching movementsrewardvigor

Identifiers

PMID35277452
PMCPMC8970337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.