Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35277406›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Pilot study to investigate the feasibility of conducting a randomised controlled trial that compares Immediate versus Optional Delayed surgical repair for treatment of acute Anterior cruciate ligament injury: IODA pilot trial.

Annemie Smeets, Feryal Ghafelzadeh Ahwaz, Stijn Bogaerts, An De Groef, Pieter Berger, Jean-François Kaux, Christophe Daniel, Jean-Louis Croisier, François Delvaux, Annouschka Laenen and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04408690 (A Pilot Study to Investigate the Feasibility of Conducting a Randomized Controlled Trial That Compares Immediate Versus Optional Delayed Surgical Repair for Treatment of Acute Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04408690 phase3completednot on this map

A Pilot Study to Investigate the Feasibility of Conducting a Randomized Controlled Trial That Compares Immediate Versus Optional Delayed Surgical Repair for Treatment of Acute Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversitaire Ziekenhuizen KU LeuvenRan2020 to 2023Enrolled29ConditionsAnterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesArmsImmediate anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, Rehabilitation, Optional delayed anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Annemie SmeetsDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences & Physiotherapy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium annemie.smeets@kuleuven.be.ORCID 0000-0003-4569-8652
Feryal Ghafelzadeh AhwazDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Stijn BogaertsDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
An De GroefDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences & Physiotherapy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Pieter BergerDepartment of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Jean-François KauxDepartment of Physical Medicine and Sports Traumatology, Unversity Hospital of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Christophe DanielDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University Hospital of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Jean-Louis CroisierDepartment of Physical Medicine and Sports Traumatology, Unversity Hospital of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
François DelvauxDepartment of Sports and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Annouschka LaenenLeuven Biostatistics and Statistical Bioinformatics Centre, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Filip StaesDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences & Physiotherapy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Koen PeersDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
KU Leuven · BEUniversity of Liège · BEStatistics Belgium · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionStandard care for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries includes surgical reconstruction of the ACL. However, two randomised controlled trials (RCTs) concluded that conservative treatment does not result in inferior clinical outcomes compared with immediate ACL reconstruction. More research is needed to in the first place verify these results, and second to assess whether patient-specific parameters determine whether a patient would benefit from one treatment option over the other. However, before running a full RCT, it seems necessary to perform a pilot study that assesses the feasibility of recruiting patients with ACL for such a RCT. This is because recruitment may be challenging as many patients have strong treatment beliefs. Therefore, this pilot study will assess whether a large RCT is feasible with regard to participant recruitment, adherence to the allocated treatment arm and protocol feasibility. These pilot findings will help deciding about progressing to a future full RCT. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a pragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled pilot trial with two parallel groups. Patients with an acute ACL injury will be recruited from two Belgian hospitals. Patients will be randomised to either conservative treatment or surgical treatment. Patients will be followed-up at 3, 6 and 12 months postrandomisation. Recruitment feasibility will be evaluated by calculating the recruitment rate 4 months after the two sites have been initiated. Clear criteria for progression to a full trial are defined. Adherence to the protocol will be assessed by calculating the proportion of patients who complete the assessments. Furthermore the proportion of patients who cross-over between treatment arms during the follow-up period will be assessed. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was approved by the ethical committees: Ethische Commissie Onderzoek UZ/KU Leuven (S62004) and Comité d'Ethique Hospitalo-Facultaire Universitaire de Liège (2020212). Results will be made available to caregivers, researchers and funder. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: This trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04408690) on 29 May 2020.

Indexed as

Anterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesAnterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionConservative TreatmentFeasibility StudiesHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicPilot ProjectsPragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment Outcomeorthopaedic sports traumarehabilitation medicinesports medicine

Identifiers

PMID35277406
PMCPMC8919438
OpenAlexW4220753212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.