Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35277280›Full record

ArticleGynecologic oncology2022

Differences in the microbial profiles of early stage endometrial cancers between Black and White women.

Gabrielle M Hawkins, Wesley C Burkett, Amber N McCoy, Hazel B Nichols, Andrew F Olshan, Russell Broaddus, Jason D Merker, Bernard Weissman, Wendy R Brewster, Jeffrey Roach and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gynecologic oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Reproductive tract microbiome dysbiosis associated with gynecological diseases.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Bacterial infection and microbiota in carcinogenesis and tumor development.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gabrielle M HawkinsUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, United States of America.
Wesley C BurkettUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, United States of America. Electronic address: wesley.burkett@unchealth.unc.edu.
Amber N McCoyUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Medicine, Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, United States of America. Electronic address: amber_mccoy@med.unc.edu.
Hazel B NicholsUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Gillings School of Global Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, United States of America; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, United States of America. Electronic address: hbn@email.unc.edu.
Andrew F OlshanUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Gillings School of Global Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, United States of America; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, United States of America. Electronic address: andy_olshan@unc.edu.
Russell BroaddusUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, United States of America; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, United States of America. Electronic address: rbroaddus@med.unc.edu.
Jason D MerkerUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, United States of America; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, United States of America. Electronic address: jason_merker@med.unc.edu.
Bernard WeissmanUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, United States of America; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, United States of America. Electronic address: bernard_weissman@med.unc.edu.
Wendy R BrewsterUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, United States of America; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, United States of America. Electronic address: wrbrewst@med.unc.edu.
Jeffrey RoachUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Medicine, Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, United States of America. Electronic address: jeff_roach@unc.edu.
Temitope O KekuUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Medicine, Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, United States of America. Electronic address: temitope_keku@med.unc.edu.
Victoria Bae-JumpUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, United States of America; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, United States of America. Electronic address: victoria_baejump@med.unc.edu.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

UNC-CH CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH &SUSCEPTIBILITYP30ES010126 · NIEHS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Melissa A. Troester · 2001 to 2026
$36.3M
PILOT AND FEASIBILITY STUDIESP30DK034987 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ROBERT S. SANDLER · 1985 to 2026
$30.5M
UNC Integrated Translational Oncology Program (UNC-iTOP)T32CA244125 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI WILLIAM Y. KIM, Jen Jen Yeh · 2019 to 2026
$3.9M
Obesity-driven Metabolic and Molecular Biomarkers of Metformin Response in Endometrial CancerR37CA226969 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BAE-JUMP, VICTORIA LIN · 2018 to 2024
$2.5M
Inter-relationship between microbiota diversity, obesity and race in endometrial cancerR21CA220269 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BAE-JUMP, VICTORIA LIN, KEKU, TEMITOPE O. · 2017 to 2018
$372k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA220269NCI NIH HHS R37 CA226969NCI NIH HHS T32 CA244125NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK034987NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES010126
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveBlack women suffer a higher mortality from endometrial cancer (EC) than White women. Potential biological causes for this disparity include a higher prevalence of obesity and more lethal histologic/molecular subtypes. We hypothesize that another biological factor driving this racial disparity could be the EC microbiome.

methodsBanked tumor specimens of postmenopausal, Black and White women undergoing hysterectomy for early stage endometrioid EC were identified. The microbiota of the tumors were characterized by bacterial 16S rRNA sequencing. The microbial component of endometrioid ECs in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database were assessed for comparison.

results95 early stage ECs were evaluated: 23 Black (24%) and 72 White (76%). Microbial diversity was increased (p < 0.001), and Firmicutes, Cyanobacteria and OD1 phyla abundance was higher in tumors from Black versus White women (p < 0.001). Genus level abundance of Dietzia and Geobacillus were found to be lower in tumors of obese Black versus obese White women (p < 0.001). Analysis of early stage ECs in TCGA found that microbial diversity was higher in ECs from Black versus White women (p < 0.05). When comparing ECs from obese Black versus obese White women, 5 bacteria distributions were distinct, with higher abundance of Lactobacillus acidophilus in ECs from Black women being the most striking difference. Similarly in TCGA, Dietzia and Geobacillus were more common in ECs from White women compared to Black.

conclusionIncreased microbial diversity and the distinct microbial profiles between ECs of obese Black versus obese White women suggests that intra-tumoral bacteria may contribute to EC disparities and pathogenesis.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, EndometrioidEndometrial NeoplasmsFemaleHumansObesityRNA, Ribosomal, 16SWhite PeopleRNA, Ribosomal, 16SEndometrial cancerRace disparitiesUterine microbiome

Identifiers

PMID35277280
PMCPMC9093563
OpenAlexW4221021855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.