Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35277262›Full record

SynthesisFertility and sterility2022

Live birth and pregnancy rates after in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection in women with previous unilateral oophorectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Kenny A Rodriguez-Wallberg, Hanna P Nilsson, Tekla Lind

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Fertility and sterility, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Improving diagnostic accuracy of ovarian torsion using contrast-enhanced ultrasound: A prospective comparative clinical study of performance diagnosis.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kenny A Rodriguez-WallbergDepartment of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; Laboratory of Translational Fertility Preservation, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Reproductive Medicine, Division of Gynaecology and Reproduction, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden. Electronic address: kenny.rodriguez-wallberg@ki.se.
Hanna P NilssonDepartment of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Tekla LindDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden.
Karolinska University Hospital · SEStockholm South General Hospital · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo quantify the effect of unilateral oophorectomy (UO) on the rates of live birth and pregnancy in women undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI).

designSystematic review and meta-analysis.

settingSearch of databases of published articles. PATIENT(S): The final analytical cohort encompassed 1,057 IVF/ICSI cycles in women with previous UO and 45,813 IVF/ICSI cycles in control women. Eighteen studies were identified by database searches of MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and cited references. The review encompassed studies published up to June 1, 2021. INTERVENTION(S): UO prior to IVF/ICSI. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The primary outcomes were the rates of live birth and pregnancy following IVF/ICSI. The secondary outcomes included the amount of gonadotropins administered for ovarian stimulation and the number of retrieved oocytes. RESULT(S): The studies were rated from medium to high quality (from 5 to 8) according to the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale. All studies were observational, with inherent bias, and heterogeneity was high. The primary outcome of live birth had a significantly lower odds ratio (OR) in women with previous UO compared with controls (OR = 0.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.57 to 0.91, z = -2.72). The OR for pregnancy rate per initiated treatment cycle was also significantly lower in women with previous UO compared with controls (OR = 0.70, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.86, z = -3.35). Additionally, the dose of administered gonadotropins was significantly higher and the number of retrieved oocytes was significantly lower in women with UO. CONCLUSION(S): The meta-analysis showed a significant detrimental effect of UO on the rates of live birth and pregnancy. The analysis further supports previous data showing a decreased sensitivity to gonadotropins and a lower number of recovered oocytes in women with previous UO. STUDY REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO 2020, CRD42020160313.

Indexed as

Live BirthSperm Injections, IntracytoplasmicFemaleFertilization in VitroGonadotropinsHumansOvariectomyOvulation InductionPregnancyPregnancy RateGonadotropinsICSIIVFlive birth rateovarian reservepregnancy rateunilateral oophorectomy

Identifiers

PMID35277262
OpenAlexW4220970245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.