Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35277202›Full record

ReviewAllergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology2022

Intravenous immunoglobulins improve live birth rate among women with underlying immune conditions and recurrent pregnancy loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Denise H J Habets, Kim Pelzner, Lotte Wieten, Marc E A Spaanderman, Eduardo Villamor, Salwan Al-Nasiry

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Functional Roles of lncRNAs in Recurrent Pregnancy Loss: A Review Study.International journal of fertility & sterility · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Denise H J Habets *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC+), Maastricht, The Netherlands. denise.habets@maastrichtuniversity.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7018-3226
Kim Pelzner *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC+), Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Lotte WietenDepartment of Transplantation Immunology, Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC+), Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Marc E A SpaandermanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC+), Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Eduardo VillamorGROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Salwan Al-NasiryDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC+), Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Maastricht University Medical Centre · NL

Funding

maastricht universitair medisch centrum Academic Incentive Maastricht
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) is increasingly used as a treatment for recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) despite lack of clear evidence on efficacy. Recent data suggest IVIG might be more effective in a subgroup of women with an aberrant immunological profile. Therefore, a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies on the effectiveness of IVIG treatment on pregnancy outcome among women with RPL and underlying immunological conditions (e.g., elevated NK cell percentage, elevated Th1/Th2 ratio, diagnosis with autoimmune disorders) was conducted. Eight non-randomized controlled trials, including 478 women (intervention: 284; control: 194), met eligibility criteria. Meta-analysis showed that treatment with IVIG was associated with a two-fold increase in live birth rate (RR 1.98, 95% CI 1.44-2.73, P < 0.0001). The effect of IVIG was particularly marked in the subgroup of studies including patients based on presence of elevated (> 12%) NK-cell percentage (RR 2.32, 95% CI 1.77-3.02, P < 0.0001) and when starting intervention prior to or during cycle of conception (RR 4.47, 95% CI 1.53-13.05, P = 0.006). In conclusion, treatment with IVIG may improve live birth rate in women with RPL and underlying immune conditions. However, these results should be interpreted with caution as studies are limited by low number of participants and the non-randomized design, which represent seriously biases. Future randomized controlled trials in women with RPL and underlying immune conditions are needed before using IVIG in a clinical setting.

Indexed as

IVIGRPL

Identifiers

PMID35277202
PMCPMC8917719
OpenAlexW4220730977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.