Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35277161›Full record

Observational studyBMC musculoskeletal disorders2022

Clinical outcomes one year after a digital musculoskeletal (MSK) program: an observational, longitudinal study with nonparticipant comparison group.

Grace Wang, Manshu Yang, Mindy Hong, Jeffrey Krauss, Jeannie F Bailey

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Grace WangHinge Health, Inc., 455 Market Street, Suite 700, CA, 94105, San Francisco, USA. grace.wang@hingehealth.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1392-1218
Manshu YangDepartment of Psychology, University of Rhode Island, Chafee Hall 406, 142 Flagg Road, Kingston, RI, 02881, USA.
Mindy HongHinge Health, Inc., 455 Market Street, Suite 700, CA, 94105, San Francisco, USA.
Jeffrey KraussHinge Health, Inc., 455 Market Street, Suite 700, CA, 94105, San Francisco, USA.
Jeannie F BaileyOrthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, 95 Kirkham St., San Francisco, CA, 94122, USA.
Hinge Health · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Rhode Island · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe evidence base for the impact of digital health on musculoskeletal (MSK) outcomes is growing, but it is unclear how much digital MSK programs address pain and function in the intermediate and long term.

methodsThis observational study of digital MSK program participants versus nonparticipants (n = 2570) examined pain, function, depression, and anxiety at 3, 6, and 12 months, and health care use at 12 months. The intervention group engaged in a digital MSK program that included exercise, education, and coaching for at least 3 months. The nonparticipant group registered, but never started the program. We collected data in app or by emailed survey at 3, 6, and 12 months after registering for the program. We conducted descriptive analyses and unadjusted and adjusted regression modeling.

resultsThe odds ratio of achieving a minimally clinically important difference (MCID) in pain improvement for the intervention versus the nonparticipant group was 1.97 (95% CI: 1.28, 3.02; p = .002) at 3 months, 1.44 (95% CI: 0.91, 2.25; p = .11) at 6 months, and 2.06 (95% CI: 1.38, 3.08; p = .004) at 12 months in adjusted models. The odds ratio of achieving a MCID in functional improvement for the intervention versus the nonparticipant group was 1.56 (95% CI: 1.03, 2.38; p = .01) at 3 months, 1.55 (95% CI: 1.02, 2.37; p = .04) at 6 months, and 1.35 (95% CI: 0.89, 2.06, p = 0.16) at 12 months in adjusted models. For those with moderate to severe depression or anxiety at baseline, we observed statistically significant lower odds of moderate to severe depression or anxiety at 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months for the intervention versus the nonparticipant group in adjusted models (p < .05). At 12 months, the percentage with invasive, imaging, and conservative services was higher for the nonparticipant versus intervention group by 5.7, 8.1, and 16.7 percentage points, respectively (p < 0.05).

conclusionsA digital MSK program may offer participants sustained improvement in pain, depression, and anxiety with concomitant decreases in health care use.

Indexed as

Anxiety DisordersPainAnxietyHumansLongitudinal StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesAnxietyDepressionFunctionMusculoskeletal painTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID35277161
PMCPMC8914456
OpenAlexW4221094431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.