ArticleBMC ophthalmology2022
The Fujian eye cross sectional study: objectives, design, and general characteristics.
Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effective Cataract Surgery Coverage and Potential Influencing Factors for Adults in Fujian, Southeast of China: Fujian Eye Study.BioMed research international · 2026Article
- Prevalence and associated factors of uncorrected presbyopia among adults in cross-sectional Fujian Eye Study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Prevalence and associated factors of vitreoretinal interface disorders using multicolour OCT among Chinese population in Fujian eye study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Prevalence and associated factors of epiretinal membrane using spectralis OCT in Fujian Eye Study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The Association Between Smartphone Use and Risk of Hypertension in Adults: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.International journal of general medicine · 2025Article
- Machine learning models for risk prediction of age-related macular degeneration in Fujian eye study.PloS one · 2025Article
- Grasshopper platform-assisted design optimization of fujian rural earthen buildings considering low-carbon emissions reduction.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Improve the efficiency and accuracy of ophthalmologists' clinical decision-making based on AI technology.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024Article
- Uncorrected near vision acuity and associated factors in a coastal province in southern China: the Fujian eye cross sectional study.Annals of translational medicine · 2022Article
- Accuracy and feasibility with AI-assisted OCT in retinal disorder community screening.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo describe the objective and design of the Fujian Eye Study and to introduce the general characteristics and vision condition of this study.
methodsThe Fujian Eye Study (FJES) is a population-based cross-sectional survey on the public eye health status of residents over 50 years old in the entire Fujian Province of Southern China, which contains both urban and rural areas and coastal and inland regions. 10,044 participants were enrolled using a two-stage cluster sampling design and underwent a questionnaire and a series of standard examinations both physical and ocular. The main subgroups of data collection included age, sex, region, refractive error, education background, income, eating habits, smartphone usage in the dark, complaints of eye discomfort, history of chronic diseases, consumption of tobacco, alcohol, or tea.
results8211 (81.8%) participants were finally included and were divided into urban populations (4678 subjects) and rural populations (3533 subjects) and coastal residents (6434 subjects) and inland residents (1777 subjects); 4836 participants were female. The mean age was 64.39 (SD 8.87) years (median 64 years; range 50-98 years). 227 (3.33%) had vision impairment (VI), 195 (2.87%) had low vision and 14 (0.21%) were blind. The mean presenting near visual acuity (PNVA) was 0.28 (0.17), the mean presenting distance visual acuity (PDVA) was 0.61 (0.30), and the mean best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 0.82 (0.28).
conclusionsThe FJES collected detailed questionnaire information and overall ocular and physical examinations, which provide the opportunity to identify risk factors and images of VI and eye diseases and to evaluate their associations with chronic diseases and basic personal information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.