Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35277139›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2022

Prevalence and associated factors for stunting, underweight and wasting among children under 6 years of age in rural Hunan Province, China: a community-based cross-sectional study.

Huixia Li, Shan Yuan, Hualing Fang, Guangwen Huang, Qun Huang, Hua Wang, Aihua Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Huixia LiDepartment of Child Health Care, Hunan Provincial Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, No.53, Xiangchun Road, Kaifu District, Changsha, 410008, China.
Shan YuanDepartment of Child Health Care, Hunan Provincial Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, No.53, Xiangchun Road, Kaifu District, Changsha, 410008, China.
Hualing FangDepartment of Child Health Care, Hunan Provincial Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, No.53, Xiangchun Road, Kaifu District, Changsha, 410008, China.
Guangwen HuangDepartment of Child Health Care, Hunan Provincial Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, No.53, Xiangchun Road, Kaifu District, Changsha, 410008, China. 5413603a@163.com.
Qun HuangDepartment of Child Health Care, Hunan Provincial Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, No.53, Xiangchun Road, Kaifu District, Changsha, 410008, China.
Hua WangNHC Key Laboratory of Birth Defect for Research and Prevention, Hunan Provincial Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Changsha, Hunan Province, China. wanghsfy@163.com.
Aihua WangDepartment of Information Management, Hunan Provincial Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Changsha, Hunan Province, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe existing epidemiological data cannot represent the situation of undernutrition among Chinese children, particularly those in rural China. Hence, in this community-based cross-sectional study, the prevalence and associated factors of stunting, underweight and wasting among children (age < 6 years) from rural Hunan Province were analyzed.

methodsTotally 5529 children aged 0 to 71 months and their caregivers were randomly chosen by multistage stratified cluster sampling from 72 villages from rural Hunan, which were distributed in 24 towns of 12 counties. Data about the children and their mothers, caregivers and family conditions was acquired using unified questionnaire, and the length/height and weight of each child were measured using unified instruments. The prevalence of undernutrition among children was evaluated using the length/height for age, weight for age, weight for length/height, and body mass index for age z scores, which were computed according to the 2006 and 2007 WHO Child Growth Standards.

resultsThe prevalence of stunting, underweight, and wasting among the 5529 children were 4.4% (241), 3.9% (217), and 4.0% (221), respectively. The significant associated factors on higher risks of undernutrition in the children were low birth weight, maternal gestational weight gain <10 kg (stunting); low birth weight, maternal gestational weight gain <10 kg, ethnicity of caregivers being minority, large family size (underweight); low birth weight, ethnicity of caregivers being minority, large family size (wasting). High education level of caregivers and high family food expenditure were common protective factors for all three types of undernutrition, except that high family food expenditure was not protective against wasting.

conclusionsThe prevalence of stunting, underweight and wasting is low among rural children under age of 6 years in Hunan. As for the measures, the gestational care and reasonable diet of mothers should be strengthened, and nutritional deficiency during pregnancy be avoided, which will prevent low birth weight. The local economic development and the education level of caregivers need to be further improved, especially for minorities.

Indexed as

Gestational Weight GainMalnutritionChildChild, PreschoolChinaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGrowth DisordersHumansInfantNutritional StatusPregnancyPrevalenceRisk FactorsThinnessChildrenChinaPrevalenceRuralStuntingUnderweightWasting

Identifiers

PMID35277139
PMCPMC8917668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.