Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35277055›Full record

Trial reportNutrients2022

Randomized Controlled Trial of Two Timepoints for Introduction of Standardized Complementary Food in Preterm Infants.

Nadja Haiden, Margarita Thanhaeuser, Fabian Eibensteiner, Mercedes Huber-Dangl, Melanie Gsoellpointner, Robin Ristl, Bettina Kroyer, Sophia Brandstetter, Margit Kornsteiner-Krenn, Christoph Binder and 2 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nutrients, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Observational
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Nadja HaidenDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-4806-0312
Margarita ThanhaeuserDepartment of Pediatrics, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Fabian EibensteinerDepartment of Pediatrics, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-5012-3082
Mercedes Huber-DanglDepartment of Pediatrics, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Melanie GsoellpointnerDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Robin RistlCenter for Medical Statistics, Informatics and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Bettina KroyerCenter for Medical Statistics, Informatics and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Sophia BrandstetterDepartment of Pediatrics, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Margit Kornsteiner-KrennDepartment of Pediatrics, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Christoph BinderDepartment of Pediatrics, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Alexandra ThajerDepartment of Pediatrics, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-1051-1141
Bernd JilmaDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.

Funding

National Bank of Austria 15378
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In term infants it is recommended to introduce solids between the 17th and 26th week of life, whereas data for preterm infants are missing. In a prospective, two-arm interventional study we investigated longitudinal growth of VLBW infants after early (10-12th) or late (16-18th) week of life, corrected for term, introduction of standardized complementary food. Primary endpoint was height at one year of age, corrected for term, and secondary endpoints were other anthropometric parameters such as weight, head circumference, BMI, and z-scores. Among 177 infants who underwent randomization, the primary outcome could be assessed in 83 (93%) assigned to the early and 83 (94%) to the late group. Mean birthweight was 941 (SD ± 253) g in the early and 932 (SD ± 256) g in the late group, mean gestational age at birth was 27 + 1/7 weeks in both groups. Height was 74.7 (mean; SD ± 2.7) cm in the early and 74.4 cm (mean; SD ± 2.8; n.s.) cm in the late group at one year of age, corrected for term. There were no differences in anthropometric parameters between the study groups except for a transient effect on weight z-score at 6 months. In preterm infants, starting solids should rather be related to neurological ability than to considerations of nutritional intake and growth.

Indexed as

Infant, PrematureInfant, Very Low Birth WeightBody HeightCephalometryHumansInfantInfant, NewbornProspective StudiesanthropometryBMIcomplementary feedinggrowthhead circumferenceheightintroduction of solidspreterm infantVLBW infantweight

Identifiers

PMID35277055
PMCPMC8839701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.