Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35277027›Full record

ReviewNutrients2022

The Potential Role of Gut Microbiota in Alzheimer's Disease: From Diagnosis to Treatment.

Angelica Varesi, Elisa Pierella, Marcello Romeo, Gaia Bavestrello Piccini, Claudia Alfano, Geir Bjørklund, Abigail Oppong, Giovanni Ricevuti, Ciro Esposito, Salvatore Chirumbolo and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nutrients, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 121 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
121citing papers in PubMed
17.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

121 citing papers in PubMed, 214 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Trehalose's untapped mechanisms in alzheimer's: gut-brain-autophagy signalling beyond the usual targets.Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Isoquinoline alkaloids inChinese herbal medicines · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

61 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Angelica VaresiDepartment of Biology and Biotechnology, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1246-2320
Elisa PierellaSchool of Medicine, Faculty of Clinical and Biomedical Sciences, University of Central Lancashire, Preston PR1 2HE, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2190-4562
Marcello RomeoDepartment of Biology and Biotechnology, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
Gaia Bavestrello PicciniEmergency Medicine, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1050 Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-5618-7404
Claudia AlfanoDepartment of Emergency Medicine and Surgery, IRCCS Fondazione Policlinico San Matteo, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
Geir BjørklundCouncil for Nutritional and Environmental Medicine (CONEM), 8610 Mo i Rana, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-2632-3935
Abigail OppongSchool of Medicine, Faculty of Clinical and Biomedical Sciences, University of Central Lancashire, Preston PR1 2HE, UK.
Giovanni RicevutiDepartment of Drug Sciences, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3422-2747
Ciro EspositoUnit of Nephrology and Dialysis, ICS Maugeri, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
Salvatore ChirumboloDepartment of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, 37121 Verona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1789-8307
Alessia PascaleSection of Pharmacology, Department of Drug Sciences, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7182-4272
University of Pavia · ITUniversity of Lancashire · GBPoliclinico San Matteo Fondazione · ITThe Research Council of Norway · NOUniversité Libre de Bruxelles · BEUniversity of Verona · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gut microbiota is emerging as a key regulator of many disease conditions and its dysregulation is implicated in the pathogenesis of several gastrointestinal and extraintestinal disorders. More recently, gut microbiome alterations have been linked to neurodegeneration through the increasingly defined gut microbiota brain axis, opening the possibility for new microbiota-based therapeutic options. Although several studies have been conducted to unravel the possible relationship between Alzheimer's Disease (AD) pathogenesis and progression, the diagnostic and therapeutic potential of approaches aiming at restoring gut microbiota eubiosis remain to be fully addressed. In this narrative review, we briefly summarize the role of gut microbiota homeostasis in brain health and disease, and we present evidence for its dysregulation in AD patients. Based on these observations, we then discuss how dysbiosis might be exploited as a new diagnostic tool in early and advanced disease stages, and we examine the potential of prebiotics, probiotics, fecal microbiota transplantation, and diets as complementary therapeutic interventions on disease pathogenesis and progression, thus offering new insights into the diagnosis and treatment of this devastating and progressive disease.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseGastrointestinal MicrobiomeDysbiosisFecal Microbiota TransplantationHumansPrebioticsPrebioticsAlzheimer’s diseasebiomarkerdietdysbiosisfecal microbiota transplantationgut–brain axisgut microbiotaprebioticsprobiotics

Identifiers

PMID35277027
PMCPMC8840394
OpenAlexW4210475085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.