Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35277023›Full record

Trial reportNutrients2022

Continuous versus Intermittent Enteral Tube Feeding for Critically Ill Patients: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial.

Hong-Yeul Lee, Jung-Kyu Lee, Hye-Jin Kim, Dal-Lae Ju, Sang-Min Lee, Jinwoo Lee

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nutrients, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Constipation in critically ill adults.World journal of gastrointestinal pathophysiology · 2025
    Review
  13. From Ancient Enemas to Tube Feeding, I: History, Administration, and Nutritional Composition of Commercial Versus Food-Based Formulas in Critical Illness.American journal of critical care : an official publication, American Association of Critical-Care Nurses · 2025
    Review
  14. Diagnostic and therapeutic management of severe acute pancreatitis. Evidence based medicine (EBM) clinical practice guidelines.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2025
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hong-Yeul LeeDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul 03080, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-3638-8890
Jung-Kyu LeeDivision of Respiratory and Critical Care, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul Metropolitan Government-Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, 20, Seoul 07061, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-5060-7255
Hye-Jin KimDepartment of Food Service and Nutritional Care, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul 03080, Korea.
Dal-Lae JuDepartment of Nutrition, Seoul Metropolitan Government-Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul 07061, Korea.
Sang-Min LeeDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul 03080, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-1388-9318
Jinwoo LeeDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 03080, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-0958-106X
Seoul National University · KRSeoul National University Hospital · KR

Funding

Seoul National University Hospital 04-2014-0620
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The appropriate strategy for enteral feeding remains a matter of debate. We hypothesized that continuous enteral feeding would result in higher rates of achieving target nutrition during the first 7 days compared with intermittent enteral feeding. We conducted an unblinded, single-center, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial involving adult patients admitted to the medical intensive care unit who required mechanical ventilation to determine the efficacy and safety of continuous enteral feeding for critically ill patients compared with intermittent enteral feeding. The primary endpoint was the achievement of ≥80% of the target nutrition requirement during the first 7 days after starting enteral feeding. A total of 99 patients were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis (intermittent enteral feeding group,

Indexed as

Critical IllnessEnteral NutritionAdultHumansIntensive Care UnitsProspective StudiesRespiration, Artificialcritically illenteral feedingmechanical ventilationnutrition

Identifiers

PMID35277023
PMCPMC8839656
OpenAlexW4210325432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.