Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35276995›Full record

Trial reportNutrients2022

Predictive Validity of Image-Based Motivation-to-Eat Visual Analogue Scales in Normal Weight Children and Adolescents Aged 9-14 Years.

Leila Hammond, Olivia Morello, Michaela Kucab, Julia O Totosy de Zepetnek, Jennifer J Lee, Tarah Doheny, Nick Bellissimo

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nutrients, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Potential indication of chemotherapy for hypodipsia and arginine vasopressin deficiency secondary to hypothalamic-pituitary Langerhans cell histiocytosis: a case report and literature review.Clinical pediatric endocrinology : case reports and clinical investigations : official journal of the Japanese Society for Pediatric Endocrinology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Leila HammondSchool of Nutrition, Ryerson University, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada.
Olivia MorelloSchool of Nutrition, Ryerson University, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada.
Michaela KucabSchool of Nutrition, Ryerson University, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada.
Julia O Totosy de ZepetnekFaculty of Kinesiology and Health Studies, University of Regina, Regina, SK S4S 0A2, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7011-5143
Jennifer J LeeSchool of Nutrition, Ryerson University, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9381-2280
Tarah DohenySchool of Nutrition, Ryerson University, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada.
Nick BellissimoSchool of Nutrition, Ryerson University, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Paper-based motivation-to-eat visual analogue scales (VASs) developed for adults are widely used in the pediatric age range. The VAS is comprised of four domains: hunger, fullness, desire to eat, and prospective food consumption. The purpose of the present study was to determine agreement between the traditional paper-based VAS and a novel digital VAS (with and without images), as well as the novel digital VAS's predictive validity for subsequent food intake (FI) in 9-14-year-old children and adolescents. Following an overnight fast and 3 h after consuming a standardized breakfast at home, children and adolescents (

Indexed as

MotivationSatiationAdolescentAdultAppetiteChildHumansHungerVisual Analog Scaleadolescentschildrenfood intakemotivation-to-eatsubjective appetitevisual analogue scale

Identifiers

PMID35276995
PMCPMC8840208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.