Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35276860›Full record

ArticleNutrients2022

Human Serum Betaine and Associated Biomarker Concentrations Following a 14 Day Supplemental Betaine Loading Protocol and during a 28 Day Washout Period: A Pilot Investigation.

Steven B Machek, Emilia E Zawieja, Jeffery L Heileson, Dillon R Harris, Dylan T Wilburn, Emma A Fletcher, Jason M Cholewa, Artur Szwengiel, Agata Chmurzynska, Darryn S Willoughby

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Steven B MachekDepartment of Health, Human Performance, and Recreation, Robbins College of Health and Human Sciences, Baylor University, Waco, TX 76706, USA.
Emilia E ZawiejaDepartment of Human Nutrition and Dietetics, The Poznań University of Life Sciences, 60-637 Poznań, Poland.
Jeffery L HeilesonDepartment of Health, Human Performance, and Recreation, Robbins College of Health and Human Sciences, Baylor University, Waco, TX 76706, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7071-9238
Dillon R HarrisDepartment of Health, Human Performance, and Recreation, Robbins College of Health and Human Sciences, Baylor University, Waco, TX 76706, USA.
Dylan T WilburnDepartment of Health, Human Performance, and Recreation, Robbins College of Health and Human Sciences, Baylor University, Waco, TX 76706, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7043-2341
Emma A FletcherDepartment of Health, Human Performance, and Recreation, Robbins College of Health and Human Sciences, Baylor University, Waco, TX 76706, USA.
Jason M CholewaExercise Physiology Department, University of Lynchburg, Lynchburg, VA 24501, USA.
Artur SzwengielInstitute of Food Technology of Plant Origin, The Poznań University of Life Sciences, 60-637 Poznań, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4570-7221
Agata ChmurzynskaDepartment of Human Nutrition and Dietetics, The Poznań University of Life Sciences, 60-637 Poznań, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-2045-0709
Darryn S WilloughbyDepartment of Health, Human Performance, and Recreation, Robbins College of Health and Human Sciences, Baylor University, Waco, TX 76706, USA.
Baylor University · USUniversity of Life Sciences in Poznań · PLUniversity of Lynchburg · US

Funding

Human Performance and Recreation Department Doctoral Dissertation Grant n/aPolish National Science Centre DEC2017/27/N/NZ9/00750Texas ACSM SRDA n/a
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several previous investigations have employed betaine supplementation in randomized controlled crossover designs to assess its ostensible ergogenic potential. Nevertheless, prior methodology is predicated on limited pharmacokinetic data and an appropriate betaine-specific washout period is hitherto undescribed. The purpose of the present pilot investigation was therein to determine whether a 28 day washout period was sufficient to return serum betaine concentrations to baseline following a supplementation protocol. Five resistance-trained men (26 ± 6 y) supplemented with 6 g/day betaine anhydrous for 14 days and subsequently visited the lab 10 additional times during a 28 day washout period. Participants underwent venipuncture to assess serum betaine and several other parameters before (PRE) and periodically throughout the washout timeframe (POST0, -4, -7, -10, -13, -16, -19, -22, -25 and -28). All analyses were performed at a significance level of p < 0.05. While analyses failed to detect any differences in any other serum biomarker (p > 0.05), serum betaine was significantly elevated from PRE-to-POST0 (p = 0.047; 2.31 ± 1.05 to 11.1 ± 4.91 µg·mL−1) and was statistically indistinguishable from baseline at POST4 (p = 1.00). Nevertheless, visual data assessment and an inability to assess skeletal muscle concentrations would otherwise suggest that a more conservative 7 day washout period is sufficient to truly return both serum-and-skeletal muscle betaine content to pre-supplementation levels.

Indexed as

BetaineDietary SupplementsBiomarkersHumansMaleMuscle, SkeletalPilot ProjectsBetaineBiomarkersbetaineextracellular water (ECW)growth hormone (GH)hematocrithomocysteineinsulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1)intracellular water (ICW)serumtrimethylglycinewashout

Identifiers

PMID35276860
PMCPMC8839982
OpenAlexW4210695501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.