Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35276492›Full record

ArticleComprehensive psychiatry2022

An intervention package for supporting the mental well-being of community health workers in low, and middle-income countries during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Kenneth Yakubu, David Musoke, Kingsley Chikaphupha, Alyssa Chase-Vilchez, Pallab K Maulik, Rohina Joshi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Comprehensive psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kenneth YakubuThe George Institute for Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia. Electronic address: kyakubu@georgeinstitute.org.au.
David MusokeDepartment of Disease Control and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Kingsley ChikaphuphaResearch for Equity and Community Health (REACH) Trust, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Alyssa Chase-VilchezGlobal Alliance for Chronic Diseases, London, United Kingdom.
Pallab K MaulikThe George Institute for Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia; The George Institute for Global Health, New Delhi, India; Prasanna School of Public Health, Manipal University, Manipal, India.
Rohina JoshiThe George Institute for Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia; The George Institute for Global Health, New Delhi, India; School of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/S023224/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs the COVID-19 pandemic continues, there is an increasing reliance on community health workers (CHWs) to achieve its control especially in low, and middle-income countries (LMICs). An increase in the demand for their services and the challenges they already face make them prone to mental health illness. Therefore, there is a need to further support the mental health and well-being of CHWs during the COVID-19 pandemic.

methodsWe organised a workshop on Zoom to deliberate on relevant components of an intervention package for supporting the mental health of CHWs in LMICs during the COVID-19 pandemic. We used a thematic analysis approach to summarise deliberations from this workshop. OUTCOMES: Participants identified the need for a hub for coordinating CHW activities, a care coordination team to manage their health, training programs aimed at improving their work performance and taking control of their health, a communication system that keeps them in touch with colleagues, family, and the communities they serve. They cautioned against confidentiality breaches while handling personal health information and favoured tailoring interventions to the unique needs of CHWs. Participants also advised on the need to ensure job security for CHWs and draw on available resources in the community. To measure the impact of such an intervention package, participants encouraged the use of mixed methods and a co-designed approach.

interpretationAs CHWs contribute to the pandemic response in LMICs, their mental health and well-being need to be protected. Such protection can be provided by using an intervention package that harnesses inputs from members of the broader health system, their families, and communities.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsCommunity Health WorkersConfidentialityDeveloping CountriesHumansMental HealthCommunity Health WorkersCOVID-19Delivery of Health Care

Identifiers

PMID35276492
PMCPMC8881902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.