Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35276440›Full record

SynthesisESMO open2022

Survival after neoadjuvant therapy with trastuzumab-lapatinib and chemotherapy in patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.

V Guarneri, G Griguolo, F Miglietta, P F Conte, M V Dieci, F Girardi

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in ESMO open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

V GuarneriDepartment of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padova, Italy; Oncology 2, Veneto Institute of Oncology - IOV - IRCCS, Padova, Italy. Electronic address: valentina.guarneri@unipd.it.
G GriguoloDepartment of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padova, Italy; Oncology 2, Veneto Institute of Oncology - IOV - IRCCS, Padova, Italy.
F MigliettaDepartment of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padova, Italy.
P F ConteDepartment of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padova, Italy; Oncology 2, Veneto Institute of Oncology - IOV - IRCCS, Padova, Italy.
M V DieciDepartment of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padova, Italy; Oncology 2, Veneto Institute of Oncology - IOV - IRCCS, Padova, Italy.
F GirardiOncology 2, Veneto Institute of Oncology - IOV - IRCCS, Padova, Italy.
Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITUniversity of Padua · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStudies testing the addition of lapatinib to neoadjuvant trastuzumab + chemotherapy reported an increase in pathologic complete response (pCR), with, nevertheless, discordant results in terms of survival, mainly due to suboptimal power. We here leverage the meta-analytic approach to resolve these inconsistencies.

methodsWe conducted a meta-analysis of randomized phase II/III studies testing lapatinib + trastuzumab in combination with neoadjuvant chemotherapy for human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER2)-positive early breast cancer (BC). Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were adopted as survival endpoints. Pooled hazard ratios (HR) were obtained for the effect of lapatinib + trastuzumab versus trastuzumab, pCR versus no-pCR in the whole study populations and pCR versus no-pCR according to hormone receptor status.

resultsFour phase II/III randomized trials were included in the meta-analysis (CALGB 40601, Cher-LOB, NSABP-B41, NeoALTTO) for an overall population of 1410 patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy in association with either trastuzumab, lapatinib or their combination. RFS was significantly improved with dual HER2 blockade as compared to trastuzumab [HR 0.62, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.46-0.85]. Dual blockade also led to significantly improved OS (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.43-0.98). For all treatments combined, patients achieving pCR had better RFS and OS than those with residual disease (HR 0.45, 95% CI 0.34-0.60, and HR 0.32, 95% CI 0.22-0.48, for RFS and OS, respectively). In patients with hormone receptor-negative tumors, pCR was associated with 65% and 73% relative reduction of risk of relapse and death, respectively. Patients with hormone receptor-positive tumors also experienced improved RFS if they achieved pCR; however, the benefit was smaller than that in hormone receptor-negative disease.

conclusionFindings from this meta-analysis further validate the role of pCR as a strong predictor of outcome in patients with HER2-positive BC, especially in hormone receptor-negative disease. Moreover, we provide robust evidence that dual blockade with lapatinib + trastuzumab in combination with neoadjuvant chemotherapy prolongs OS, suggesting that the role of lapatinib could be reconsidered in the early setting.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsNeoadjuvant TherapyAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHormonesHumansLapatinibNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTrastuzumabErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesHormonesLapatinibTrastuzumabHER2-positive breast cancerlapatinibmeta-analysisneoadjuvant treatmenttrastuzumab

Identifiers

PMID35276440
PMCPMC8917305
OpenAlexW4220900509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.