Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35275934›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Influence of pregnancy related anthropometric changes on plantar pressure distribution during gait-A follow-up study.

Agata Masłoń, Agnieszka Suder, Marta Curyło, Barbara Frączek, Marcin Salamaga, Yuri Ivanenko, Wanda Forczek-Karkosz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Changes in Foot Biomechanics during Pregnancy and Postpartum: Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Agata MasłońSection of Rehabilitation in Orthopaedics, Clinical Rehabilitation Institute, Faculty of Motor Rehabilitation, University of Physical Education, Krakow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-5081-2179
Agnieszka SuderSection of Anatomy, Institute of Basic Sciences, Faculty of Motor Rehabilitation, University of Physical Education, Krakow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-6135-8274
Marta CuryłoSection of Rehabilitation in Internal Diseases, Clinical Rehabilitation Institute, Faculty of Motor Rehabilitation, University of Physical Education, Krakow, Poland.
Barbara FrączekSection of Sports Medicine and Human Nutrition, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, University of Physical Education, Krakow, Poland.
Marcin SalamagaDepartment of Statistics, Cracow University of Economics, Krakow, Poland.
Yuri IvanenkoLaboratory of Neuromotor Physiology, Santa Lucia Foundation, Rome, Italy.
Wanda Forczek-KarkoszSection of Biomechanics, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, University of Physical Education, Krakow, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs foot constitutes the base of support for the whole body, the pregnancy-related anthropometric changes can result in adaptive plantar pressure alterations. The present study aimed to investigate how pregnancy affects foot loading pattern in gait, and if it is related to body adjustments to growing foetus that occur in the course of pregnancy.

methodsA prospective longitudinal study included 30 women. Three experimental sessions in accordance with the same procedure were carried out in the first, second and third trimesters of pregnancy. First, the anthropometric measures of the body mass and waist circumference were taken. Then walking trials at a self-selected speed along a ~6-m walkway were registered with the FreeMED force platform (Sensor Medica, Italy). Vertical foot pressure was recorded by the force plate located in the middle of the walkway.

findingsThe correlation of individual foot loading parameters across different trimesters was relatively high. Nevertheless, our results revealed a longitudinal foot arch flattening with the strongest effect in late pregnancy (P = 0.01). The anthropometric characteristics also influenced the foot loading pattern depending on the phase of pregnancy. In particular, arch flattening correlated with the body mass in all trimesters (r≥0.44, P≤0.006) while the medial-lateral loading index correlated only in the first (r = 0.45, P = 0.005) and second (r = 0.36, P = 0.03) trimesters. Waist circumference changes significantly influenced dynamic arch flattening but only in the late pregnancy (r≥0.46, P≤0.004). In the third trimester, a small though significant increase in the right foot angle was observed (P = 0.01).

interpretationThe findings provided the characteristics of the relative foot areas loading throughout pregnancy. Growing abdominal size increases the risk of medial arch flattening, which can result in less stable gait. The observed increase in foot angle in late pregnancy may constitute a strategy to enhance gait stability.

Indexed as

GaitWalkingBiomechanical PhenomenaFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLongitudinal StudiesMalePregnancyProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID35275934
PMCPMC8916641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.