Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35275840›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical education2022

Perception of Web-Based Didactic Activities During the COVID-19 Pandemic Among Anesthesia Residents: Pilot Questionnaire Study.

Ala Nozari, Shivali Mukerji, Ling-Ling Lok, Qingrou Gu, Lauren Buhl, Sanjay Jain, Rafael Ortega

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical education, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Virtual Learning in Emergency Medicine Residency Programs.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ala NozariBoston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5755-6347
Shivali MukerjiBoston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8942-4365
Ling-Ling LokBoston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1237-8652
Qingrou GuBoston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4997-3332
Lauren BuhlBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4305-2957
Sanjay JainBoston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3944-5659
Rafael OrtegaBoston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8212-3471
Boston University · USBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhysical and social distancing recommendations aimed at limiting exposure during the COVID-19 pandemic have forced residency programs to increasingly rely on videoconferencing and web-based resources.

objectiveIn this pilot study, we aimed to explore the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on residency training experience, and to delineate the perceived barriers to the successful implementation of web-based medical education.

methodsA 19-item survey was compiled and distributed electronically using Qualtrics. This anonymous survey included information on the training level of each resident, their participation in formal didactics before and during the pandemic, and their perception of the ease and limitations of virtual didactics. The resident's opinions on specific educational resources were assessed, and the effectiveness of new delivery methods on resident engagement and learning was examined.

resultsThirty anesthesiology residents were surveyed, 19 of whom agreed to participate in the pilot study. One participant with incomplete responses was excluded, yielding a final cohort of 18 respondents. Most residents (56%, 10/18) reported that the COVID-19 pandemic negatively affected their residency training. The time spent on didactic training and independent studies was, nevertheless, not affected by the pandemic for 90% (16/18) of respondents. Nonetheless, 72% (13/18) of residents were less engaged during virtual lectures in comparison to in-person didactics. Important limitations included distraction from the physical environment (67%, 12/18), internet instability (67%, 12/18), less obligation to participate (44%, 8/18), technical difficulty and unmuted microphones (33%, 6/18, each), and people speaking over each other (28%, 5/18). Despite these limitations, most residents stated that they would like to keep a combination of virtual didactics including live Zoom lectures (56%, 10/18), prerecorded web didactics (56%, 10/18), and virtual ground rounds via Zoom (50%, 9/18) as the "new normal."

conclusionsDespite important limitations listed in this report, anesthesia residents would like to keep a combination of virtual lectures and presentations as the new normal after the COVID-19 pandemic.

Indexed as

anesthesiology residentsbarriers to educationCOVID-19didacticmedical educationmedical residentsonline educationpandemicresident educationvirtual didacticsvirtual trainingweb-based education

Identifiers

PMID35275840
PMCPMC9015768
OpenAlexW4220684328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.