Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35275809›Full record

ArticleIEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering2022

Optimized Signal Quality Assessment for Photoplethysmogram Signals Using Feature Selection.

Fahimeh Mohagheghian, Dong Han, Andrew Peitzsch, Nishat Nishita, Eric Ding, Emily L Dickson, Danielle DiMezza, Edith M Otabil, Kamran Noorishirazi, Jessica Scott and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The 2023 wearable photoplethysmography roadmap.Physiological measurement · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Fahimeh Mohagheghian
Dong Han
Andrew Peitzsch
Nishat Nishita
Eric Ding
Emily L Dickson
Danielle DiMezza
Edith M Otabil
Kamran Noorishirazi
Jessica Scott
Darleen Lessard
Ziyue Wang
Cody Whitcomb
Khanh-Van Tran
Timothy P Fitzgibbons
David D McManus
Ki H Chon

Funding

Smartwatch Monitoring for Atrial Fibrillation After StrokeR01HL137734 · NHLBI · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI CHON, KI H, MCMANUS, DAVID D. · 2018 to 2021
$3.1M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL137734
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWith the increasing use of wearable healthcare devices for remote patient monitoring, reliable signal quality assessment (SQA) is required to ensure the high accuracy of interpretation and diagnosis on the recorded data from patients. Photoplethysmographic (PPG) signals non-invasively measured by wearable devices are extensively used to provide information about the cardiovascular system and its associated diseases. In this study, we propose an approach to optimize the quality assessment of the PPG signals.

methodsWe used an ensemble-based feature selection scheme to enhance the prediction performance of the classification model to assess the quality of the PPG signals. Our approach for feature and subset size selection yielded the best-suited feature subset, which was optimized to differentiate between the clean and artifact corrupted PPG segments.

conclusionA high discriminatory power was achieved between two classes on the test data by the proposed feature selection approach, which led to strong performance on all dependent and independent test datasets. We achieved accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity rates of higher than 0.93, 0.89, and 0.97, respectively, for dependent test datasets, independent of heartbeat type, i.e., atrial fibrillation (AF) or non-AF data including normal sinus rhythm (NSR), premature atrial contraction (PAC), and premature ventricular contraction (PVC). For independent test datasets, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity rates were greater than 0.93, 0.89, and 0.97, respectively, on PPG data recorded from AF and non-AF subjects. These results were found to be more accurate than those of all of the contemporary methods cited in this work. SIGNIFICANCE: As the results illustrate, the advantage of our proposed scheme is its robustness against dynamic variations in the PPG signal during long-term 14-day recordings accompanied with different types of physical activities and a diverse range of fluctuations and waveforms caused by different individual hemodynamic characteristics, and various types of recording devices. This robustness instills confidence in the application of the algorithm to various kinds of wearable devices as a reliable PPG signal quality assessment approach.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationWearable Electronic DevicesAlgorithmsArtifactsElectrocardiographyHeart RateHumansPhotoplethysmographySignal Processing, Computer-Assisted

Identifiers

PMID35275809
PMCPMC9478959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.