ArticleIEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering2022
Optimized Signal Quality Assessment for Photoplethysmogram Signals Using Feature Selection.
Article in IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multiclass Arrhythmia Classification Using Multimodal Smartwatch Photoplethysmography Signals Collected in Real-Life Settings.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2026Article
- Signal Quality Assessment and Reconstruction of PPG-Derived Signals for Heart Rate and Variability Estimation in In-Vehicle Applications: A Comparative Review and Empirical Validation.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Determinants of photoplethysmography signal quality at the wrist.PLOS digital health · 2025Article
- Quality-Aware Signal Processing Mechanism of PPG Signal for Long-Term Heart Rate Monitoring.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- The 2023 wearable photoplethysmography roadmap.Physiological measurement · 2023Review
- BCG Signal Quality Assessment Based on Time-Series Imaging Methods.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- A Systematic Review of Machine Learning and IoT Applied to the Prediction and Monitoring of Cardiovascular Diseases.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Automated Multi-Wavelength Quality Assessment of Photoplethysmography Signals Using Modulation Spectrum Shape Features.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- LSTM-based real-time signal quality assessment for blood volume pulse analysis.Biomedical optics express · 2023Article
- Photoplethysmography temporal marker-based machine learning classifier for anesthesia drug detection.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2022Article
- Establishing best practices in photoplethysmography signal acquisition and processing.Physiological measurement · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveWith the increasing use of wearable healthcare devices for remote patient monitoring, reliable signal quality assessment (SQA) is required to ensure the high accuracy of interpretation and diagnosis on the recorded data from patients. Photoplethysmographic (PPG) signals non-invasively measured by wearable devices are extensively used to provide information about the cardiovascular system and its associated diseases. In this study, we propose an approach to optimize the quality assessment of the PPG signals.
methodsWe used an ensemble-based feature selection scheme to enhance the prediction performance of the classification model to assess the quality of the PPG signals. Our approach for feature and subset size selection yielded the best-suited feature subset, which was optimized to differentiate between the clean and artifact corrupted PPG segments.
conclusionA high discriminatory power was achieved between two classes on the test data by the proposed feature selection approach, which led to strong performance on all dependent and independent test datasets. We achieved accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity rates of higher than 0.93, 0.89, and 0.97, respectively, for dependent test datasets, independent of heartbeat type, i.e., atrial fibrillation (AF) or non-AF data including normal sinus rhythm (NSR), premature atrial contraction (PAC), and premature ventricular contraction (PVC). For independent test datasets, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity rates were greater than 0.93, 0.89, and 0.97, respectively, on PPG data recorded from AF and non-AF subjects. These results were found to be more accurate than those of all of the contemporary methods cited in this work. SIGNIFICANCE: As the results illustrate, the advantage of our proposed scheme is its robustness against dynamic variations in the PPG signal during long-term 14-day recordings accompanied with different types of physical activities and a diverse range of fluctuations and waveforms caused by different individual hemodynamic characteristics, and various types of recording devices. This robustness instills confidence in the application of the algorithm to various kinds of wearable devices as a reliable PPG signal quality assessment approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.