Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35275804›Full record

ArticleMedical education online2022

Validation of the World Health Organization Well-Being Index (WHO-5) among medical educators in Hong Kong: a confirmatory factor analysis.

Linda Chan, Rebecca K W Liu, Tai Pong Lam, Julie Y Chen, George L Tipoe, Fraide A Ganotice

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical education online, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Linda ChanDepartment of Family Medicine and Primary Care, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9802-5059
Rebecca K W LiuThe Bau Institute of Medical and Health Sciences Education, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, China.
Tai Pong LamDepartment of Family Medicine and Primary Care, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, China.
Julie Y ChenDepartment of Family Medicine and Primary Care, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7444-6182
George L TipoeThe Bau Institute of Medical and Health Sciences Education, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2603-0625
Fraide A GanoticeThe Bau Institute of Medical and Health Sciences Education, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3139-9926

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated the pre-existing global crisis of physician burnout. Physician and particularly medical educator well-being, has come into focus as educators can influence their own and learners' well-being. Measuring this construct is one important step towards promoting well-being in the work and learning environments. The 5-item World Health Organization Well-Being Index (WHO-5) has been validated in different populations worldwide for assessing well-being. Yet, its psychometric acceptability remains unexplored among medical educators in Asia including Hong Kong (HK). This study evaluates the validity of the WHO-5 when used among HK medical educators.

methodUsing data from 435 medical educators, we employed combined within-network (confirmatory factor analysis; CFA) and between-network approaches (correlation and regression) to scale validation.

resultsCFA results indicated that our data fit the a priori WHO-5 model, suggesting structural validity. Results of comparison of means indicated no gender differences, but there were significant differences when participants were compared by age and professional backgrounds. Resilience predicted well-being as measured by the WHO-5, suggesting construct criterion validity.

conclusionsOur findings extend the validity evidence for the WHO-5 to HK medical educators examined in this study. This enables their well-being to be assessed when evaluating the impact of future well-being programmes.

Indexed as

Faculty, MedicalMental HealthSurveys and QuestionnairesCOVID-19Factor Analysis, StatisticalHong KongHumansPandemicsReproducibility of ResultsWorld Health Organizationconfirmatory factor analysismedical educatorspsychometricsWell-beingWHO-5

Identifiers

PMID35275804
PMCPMC8920356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.