Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35275381›Full record

ArticlePain and therapy2022

The Intraoperative Adherence to Multimodal Analgesia of Anesthesiologists: A Retrospective Study.

Yumiao He, Wei Chen, Linan Qin, Chao Ma, Gang Tan, Yuguang Huang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pain and therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yumiao HeDepartment of Anesthesiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shuaifuyuan No.1, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.
Wei ChenDepartment of Gastroenterology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Beijing, 100050, China.
Linan QinDepartment of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Chao MaJoint Laboratory of Anesthesia and Pain, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China.
Gang TanDepartment of Anesthesiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shuaifuyuan No.1, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China. tangangqd@aliyun.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1998-5519
Yuguang HuangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shuaifuyuan No.1, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China. garypumch@163.com.
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNNational Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases · CN

Funding

Peking Union Medical College Hospital zc201910402Postdoctoral Research Foundation of China 2020M680453
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMultimodal analgesia (MMA) is a critical component of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS). However, little research revealed its intraoperative implementation by anesthesiologists, who are on the front line defending against surgical pain. Therefore, the objective of our study is to assess the adherence of anesthesiologists to MMA comprehensively.

methodsA retrospective study was conducted involving patients undergoing lung resection, knee arthroplasty, and radical mastectomy from pre/post-implementation year of MMA (Jan 1, 2013, to Dec 31, 2013, vs. 2019). Intraoperative analgesia regimens (analgesic mode) and hourly rated morphine milligram equivalents (MME) were compared. In addition, patient characteristics associated with continued opioid use after surgery, surgical types, and position level of anesthesiologists (attending-junior; above attending-senior) were also analyzed.

resultsAfter MMA initiation, the rate of multimodal analgesic regimen (mode ≥ 2) was significantly increased (post- vs. pre-implementation, 31.57 vs. 21.50%, p < 0.05). However, MME did not show significant difference (post- vs. pre-implementation, 0.402 vs. 0.456, p > 0.05). Patient-level predictors of persistent opioid use after surgery were not related to increased analgesic mode. Lung resection [coefficient, - 0.538; 95% confidence interval (CI), - 0.695 to - 0.383, p < 0.001] and knee arthroplasty (coefficient, - 1.143; 95% CI, - 1.366 to - 0.925, p < 0.001) discouraged multiple analgesic mode, while senior anesthesiologists (coefficient, 0.674; 95% CI 0.548-0.800, p < 0.001) promoted it.

conclusionsAlthough anesthesiologists used more analgesics after promoting MMA, the "opioid-sparing" principle was not followed properly. The analgesic mode was not instructed by patients' characteristics appropriately. In addition, surgeries with cumbersome preparation/process impeded the use of multiple analgesic modes, while senior anesthesiologists preferred multiple analgesic modes.

Indexed as

Anesthesiologists’ behaviorIntraoperative adherenceMultimodal analgesiaRelated factors

Identifiers

PMID35275381
PMCPMC9098701
OpenAlexW4220666700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.