Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35275361›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2023

Treating persistent pain after breast cancer: practice gaps and future directions.

An De Groef, Mira Meeus, Lauren C Heathcote, Louise Wiles, Mark Catley, Anna Vogelzang, Ian Olver, William B Runciman, Peter Hibbert, Lore Dams and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Factors associated with cancer-related pain among Utah cancer survivors.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

An De GroefDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, University of Antwerp, Campus Drie Eiken, Room R3.08, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610, Wilrijk Antwerp, Belgium. an.degroef@uantwerpen.be.ORCID 0000-0001-6771-2836
Mira MeeusDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, University of Antwerp, Campus Drie Eiken, Room R3.08, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610, Wilrijk Antwerp, Belgium.
Lauren C HeathcoteHealth Psychology Section, Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Louise WilesInnovation, Implementation & Clinical Translation (IIMPACT) in Health, University of South Australia, Kaurna Country, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Mark CatleyInnovation, Implementation & Clinical Translation (IIMPACT) in Health, University of South Australia, Kaurna Country, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Anna VogelzangInnovation, Implementation & Clinical Translation (IIMPACT) in Health, University of South Australia, Kaurna Country, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Ian OlverSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
William B RuncimanSouth Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Peter HibbertInnovation, Implementation & Clinical Translation (IIMPACT) in Health, University of South Australia, Kaurna Country, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Lore DamsDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, University of Antwerp, Campus Drie Eiken, Room R3.08, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610, Wilrijk Antwerp, Belgium.
Bart MorlionSection Anesthesiology and Algology, Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, KU Leuven, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
G Lorimer MoseleyInnovation, Implementation & Clinical Translation (IIMPACT) in Health, University of South Australia, Kaurna Country, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
University of South Australia · AUUniversity of Antwerp · BEKing's College London · GBKU Leuven · BESouth Australian Health and Medical Research Institute · AUThe University of Adelaide · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper discusses the growing problem of persisting pain after successful treatment of breast cancer and presents recommendations for improving pain-related outcomes for this group. We discuss the dominant treatment approach for persisting pain post-breast cancer treatment and draw contrasts with contemporary treatment approaches to persistent pain in non-cancer-related populations. We discuss modern application of the biopsychosocial model of pain and the notion of variable sensitivity within the pain system, moment by moment and over time. We present the implications of increasing sensitivity over time for treatment selection and implementation. By drawing on transformative changes in treatment approaches to persistent non-cancer-related pain, we describe the potentially powerful role that an intervention called pain science education, which is now recommended in clinical guidelines for musculoskeletal pain, may play in improving pain and disability outcomes after successful breast cancer treatment. Finally, we present several research recommendations that centre around adaptation of the content and delivery models of contemporary pain science education, to the post-breast cancer context.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCancer SurvivorsFemaleHumansPainPain ManagementProfessional Practice GapsBreast neoplasmsModels, biopsychosocialPainPain science education

Identifiers

PMID35275361
PMCPMC8914454
OpenAlexW4220836179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.