ArticleTAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik2022
Physiological breeding for yield improvement in soybean: solar radiation interception-conversion, and harvest index.
Article in TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Photosynthesis-informed breeding to enhance Soybean (Glycine max) yield potential: a framework integrating high-throughput phenomics, genomic prediction and G×E×M.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026Review
- Training systems affect spatial distribution of Korla fragrant pear (Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Identification of genomic regions associated with soybean responses to off-target dicamba exposure.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
key messageEfficiency of light interception, Radiation use efficiency and harvest index can be used as targets to improve grain yield potential in soybean. Grain yield (GY) production can be expressed as the result of three main efficiencies: light interception (Ei), radiation use (RUE), and harvest index (HI). Although dissecting GY through these three efficiencies is not entirely new, there is a lack of knowledge about the phenotypic variation, the genetic architecture, and the relative contribution of these three efficiencies on GY in soybean. This knowledge gap coupled with laborious phenotyping prevents the active consideration of these efficiencies into breeding programs. This study aims to reveal the phenotypic variation, heritability, genetic relationships, genetic architecture, and genomic prediction for Ei, RUE, and HI in soybean. We evaluated a maturity control panel of 383 Recombinant Inbred Lines (RILs) selected from the soybean nested association mapping (SoyNAM) population. Dry matter ground measured along with canopy coverage (CC) from UAS imagery were collected in three environments. Light interception was modeled through a logistic curve using CC as a proxy. The total above-ground biomass collected during the growing season and its respective cumulative light intercepted were used to derive RUE through linear models fitting. Additive-genetic correlations, genome-wide association (GWA) and whole-genome regressions (WGR) were performed to evaluate the relationship between traits, their association with genomic regions, and the feasibility of predicting these efficiencies with genomic information. Correlation analyses considered three groups: the entire data set, and the high- and low-yielding RILs to determine association as a function of the GY. Our results revealed moderate to high phenotypic variation for Ei, RUE, and HI with ranges of 8.5%, 1.1 g MJ
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.