Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35275246›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2022

A novel auricular prosthesis which incorporates a cartilage conduction hearing aid based on 3D data processing technique: a preclinical evaluation.

Takanori Nishiyama, Shintaro Hayashi, Naoki Oishi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Takanori NishiyamaDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7136-531X
Shintaro HayashiAiwa Prosthetics and Orthotics Co., Ltd., 19-4 Sakaecho, Nerima-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Naoki OishiDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan. oishin@keio.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8204-9518

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 19K18744
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo achieve the challenging goal of simultaneously improving aesthetics and auditory function in the treatment of microtia, we developed an auricular prosthesis incorporating a cartilage conduction hearing aid (APiCHA), which covers a cartilage conduction hearing aid (CC-HA). We evaluated the acoustic characteristics generated by the method of combining these two components using an artificial mastoid and investigated the possibility of clinical translation.

methodsThe first step in creating an APiCHA is to take molds of both the affected and normal auricles and invert the 3D data of the normal auricle to create data for the auricular prostheses. Grooves were then made inside the prosthetic data to fit the affected ear and a CC-HA, and the APiCHA was made of silicone. The acoustic characteristics were measured using an artificial mastoid, and the results were compared between CC-HA alone and with APiCHA.

resultsCompared with CC-HA alone, the gain was approximately 2 dB lower at high frequencies from 1 k Hz and higher, and approximately 2 dB higher at approximately 900 Hz when CC-HA was used with APiCHA. For the other frequencies, the acoustic characteristics were almost the same.

conclusionThe changes in acoustic characteristics caused by the combined use of APiCHA and CC-HA were minimal and did not pose a clinical problem. The combined use of APiCHA and CC-HA can be considered as a non-invasive and clinically applicable treatment option to achieve both aesthetic and auditory improvements for microtia.

Indexed as

Congenital MicrotiaEar AuricleHearing AidsPlastic Surgery ProceduresCartilageHumansProstheses and Implants3D data processingAtresiaAtresiaplastyAuricular reconstructionHearing lossMicrotia

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.