Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35275076›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2022

Patient-Level Fall Risk Prediction Using the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership's Common Data Model: Pilot Feasibility Study.

Hyesil Jung, Sooyoung Yoo, Seok Kim, Eunjeong Heo, Borham Kim, Ho-Young Lee, Hee Hwang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hyesil JungOffice of eHealth Research and Business, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam-si, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8346-9343
Sooyoung YooOffice of eHealth Research and Business, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam-si, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8620-4925
Seok KimOffice of eHealth Research and Business, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam-si, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4996-8613
Eunjeong HeoOffice of eHealth Research and Business, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam-si, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9632-0188
Borham KimOffice of eHealth Research and Business, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam-si, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6914-5721
Ho-Young LeeOffice of eHealth Research and Business, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam-si, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6518-0602
Hee HwangKakao Healthcare Company-In-Company, Seongnam-si, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7964-1630
Seoul National University Bundang Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFalls in acute care settings threaten patients' safety. Researchers have been developing fall risk prediction models and exploring risk factors to provide evidence-based fall prevention practices; however, such efforts are hindered by insufficient samples, limited covariates, and a lack of standardized methodologies that aid study replication.

objectiveThe objectives of this study were to (1) convert fall-related electronic health record data into the standardized Observational Medical Outcome Partnership's (OMOP) common data model format and (2) develop models that predict fall risk during 2 time periods.

methodsAs a pilot feasibility test, we converted fall-related electronic health record data (nursing notes, fall risk assessment sheet, patient acuity assessment sheet, and clinical observation sheet) into standardized OMOP common data model format using an extraction, transformation, and load process. We developed fall risk prediction models for 2 time periods (within 7 days of admission and during the entire hospital stay) using 2 algorithms (least absolute shrinkage and selection operator logistic regression and random forest).

resultsIn total, 6277 nursing statements, 747,049,486 clinical observation sheet records, 1,554,775 fall risk scores, and 5,685,011 patient acuity scores were converted into OMOP common data model format. All our models (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.692-0.726) performed better than the Hendrich II Fall Risk Model. Patient acuity score, fall history, age ≥60 years, movement disorder, and central nervous system agents were the most important predictors in the logistic regression models.

conclusionsTo enhance model performance further, we are currently converting all nursing records into the OMOP common data model data format, which will then be included in the models. Thus, in the near future, the performance of fall risk prediction models could be improved through the application of abundant nursing records and external validation.

Indexed as

accidental fallscommon data modeldata modelelectronic health recordfall riskhealth datamedical informaticsnursing recordsObservational Medical Outcomes Partnershipprediction modelrisk prediction

Identifiers

PMID35275076
PMCPMC8957002
OpenAlexW4220915814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.