Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35275066›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2022

Understanding Public Perceptions of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances: Infodemiology Study of Social Media.

Hao Tian, Christy Gaines, Lori Launi, Ana Pomales, Germaine Vazquez, Amanda Goharian, Bradley Goodnight, Erica Haney, Christopher M Reh, Rachel D Rogers

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Efficacy and Threat Language in PFAS Messaging.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hao TianOffice of Director, National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2880-9138
Christy GainesOffice of Director, National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1151-1562
Lori LauniOffice of Associated Director, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0337-138X
Ana PomalesOffice of Community Health Hazard Assessment, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6630-1047
Germaine VazquezOffice of Director, National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8700-9128
Amanda GoharianGuidehouse LLP, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3455-9550
Bradley GoodnightGuidehouse LLP, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1039-9919
Erica HaneyGuidehouse LLP, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9151-4530
Christopher M RehOffice of Associated Director, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7516-7820
Rachel D RogersOffice of Community Health Hazard Assessment, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9716-1075
Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry · USCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPer- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are environmental contaminants that have received significant public attention. PFAS are a large group of human-made chemicals that have been used in industry and consumer products worldwide since the 1950s. Human exposure to PFAS is a growing public health concern. Studies suggest that exposure to PFAS may increase the risk of some cancers and have negative health impacts on the endocrine, metabolic, and immune systems. Federal and state health partners are investigating the exposure to and possible health effects associated with PFAS. Government agencies can observe social media discourse on PFAS to better understand public concerns and develop targeted communication and outreach efforts.

objectiveThe primary objective of this study is to understand how social media is used to share, disseminate, and engage in public discussions of PFAS-related information in the United States.

methodsWe investigated PFAS-related content across 2 social media platforms between May 1, 2017, and April 30, 2019, to identify how social media is used in the United States to seek and disseminate PFAS-related information. Our key variable of interest was posts that mentioned "PFAS," "PFOA," "PFOS," and their hashtag variations across social media platforms. Additional variables included post type, time, PFAS event, and geographic location. We examined term use and post type differences across platforms. We used descriptive statistics and regression analysis to assess the incidence of PFAS discussions and to identify the date, event, and geographic patterns. We qualitatively analyzed social media content to determine the most prevalent themes discussed on social media platforms.

resultsOur analysis revealed that Twitter had a significantly greater volume of PFAS-related posts compared with Reddit (98,264 vs 3126 posts). PFAS-related social media posts increased by 670% over 2 years, indicating a marked increase in social media users' interest in and awareness of PFAS. Active engagement varied across platforms, with Reddit posts demonstrating more in-depth discussions compared with passive likes and reposts among Twitter users. Spikes in PFAS discussions were evident and connected to the discovery of contamination events, media coverage, and scientific publications. Thematic analysis revealed that social media users see PFAS as a significant public health concern and seek a trusted source of information about PFAS-related public health efforts.

conclusionsThe analysis identified a prevalent theme-on social media, PFAS are perceived as an immediate public health concern, which demonstrates a growing sense of urgency to understand this emerging contaminant and its potential health impacts. Government agencies can continue using social media research to better understand the changing community sentiment on PFAS and disseminate targeted information and then use social media as a forum for dispelling misinformation, communicating scientific findings, and providing resources for relevant public health services.

Indexed as

Social MediaCommunicationHumansInfodemiologyPublic HealthPublic OpinionUnited Statesper- and polyfluoroalkyl substancesPFASpublic perceptionssocial media

Identifiers

PMID35275066
PMCPMC8957009
OpenAlexW4206617325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.