Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35274804›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2022

Decoding motor expertise from fine-tuned oscillatory network organization.

Lucia Amoruso, Sandra Pusil, Adolfo Martín García, Agustín Ibañez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Creative experiences and brain clocks.Nature communications · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Encoding Manual Dexterity through Modulation of Intrinsic α Band Connectivity.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  6. Temporal Irreversibility of Large-Scale Brain Dynamics in Alzheimer's Disease.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lucia AmorusoBasque Center on Cognition, Brain and Language (BCBL), San Sebastian, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4696-2187
Sandra PusilDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8395-1113
Adolfo Martín GarcíaNational Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Agustín IbañezNational Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0001-6758-5101

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Can motor expertise be robustly predicted by the organization of frequency-specific oscillatory brain networks? To answer this question, we recorded high-density electroencephalography (EEG) in expert Tango dancers and naïves while viewing and judging the correctness of Tango-specific movements and during resting. We calculated task-related and resting-state connectivity at different frequency-bands capturing task performance (delta [δ], 1.5-4 Hz), error monitoring (theta [θ], 4-8 Hz), and sensorimotor experience (mu [μ], 8-13 Hz), and derived topographical features using graph analysis. These features, together with canonical expertise measures (i.e., performance in action discrimination, time spent dancing Tango), were fed into a data-driven computational learning analysis to test whether behavioral and brain signatures robustly classified individuals depending on their expertise level. Unsurprisingly, behavioral measures showed optimal classification (100%) between dancers and naïves. When considering brain models, the task-based classification performed well (~73%), with maximal discrimination afforded by theta-band connectivity, a hallmark signature of error processing. Interestingly, mu connectivity during rest outperformed (100%) the task-based approach, matching the optimal classification of behavioral measures and thus emerging as a potential trait-like marker of sensorimotor network tuning by intense training. Overall, our findings underscore the power of fine-tuned oscillatory network signatures for capturing expertise-related differences and their potential value in the neuroprognosis of learning outcomes.

Indexed as

BrainElectroencephalographyHumansLearningRestaction observationbrain networksgraph theoryhdEEGmachine learningmotor expertiseresting-state

Identifiers

PMID35274804
PMCPMC9120567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.