ArticleJournal of clinical laboratory analysis2022
Multicenter performance evaluation and reference range determination of a new one-stage factor VIII assay.
Article in Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Determination of sample stability for a broad panel of coagulation parameters and factor assays on the Cobas t 711 analyzer starting from fresh-never-frozen plasma.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2025Article
- Multicenter performance evaluation and reference range determination of a new one-stage factor VIII assay.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
introductionWe conducted a multicenter evaluation of a new one-stage factor VIII (FVIII) assay (Roche Diagnostics), intended for the quantitative assessment of FVIII activity. We evaluated the analytical performance of the FVIII assay on the cobas t 711 analyzer.
methodsExperiments performed at three laboratories used 3.2% citrated residual or commercially purchased plasma samples. Five human plasma pools and two controls were used to determine assay within-run and within-laboratory precision, and total reproducibility; coefficients of variation (CVs) and/or standard deviations (SDs) were calculated. Lot-to-lot variability and method comparison (vs Coagulation FVIII Deficient Plasma/Dade Actin FS Activated PTT reagent/Standard Human Plasma Calibrator on the Sysmex CS-5100 analyzer; Siemens Healthineers) were evaluated by Passing-Bablok and Deming regression, respectively, and Pearson's r calculated. Assay-specific reference range was determined using 199 fresh plasma samples from healthy adults, not receiving anticoagulants.
resultsAcross sites, SDs for repeatability were 0.016-0.046 for samples with ≤1.0 international units (IU)/dL FVIII activity; CVs were 0.9%-3.8% for samples with >1.0 IU/dl activity. Among samples with mean FVIII activity 0.344-133 IU/dl, good intermediate precision (SD 0.020 for samples with 0.344 IU/dl activity; CV 1.8%-4.7%) and good total reproducibility (CV 2.0%-13.3%) were observed. The FVIII assay showed excellent lot-to-lot variability (Pearson's r = .999) and good correlation with the comparator assay (Pearson's r = .993-.996). The reference range for FVIII activity was 82.2-218.0 IU/dl.
conclusionThe one-stage FVIII assay demonstrated robust analytical performance on the cobas t 711 analyzer, supporting its use in routine laboratory practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.