Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35274753›Full record

ArticleHistopathology2022

The utility of P53 immunohistochemistry in the diagnosis of Barrett's oesophagus with indefinite for dysplasia.

Wladyslaw Januszewicz, Nastazja D Pilonis, Tarek Sawas, Richard Phillips, Maria O'Donovan, Ahmad Miremadi, Shalini Malhotra, Monika Tripathi, Adrienn Blasko, David A Katzka and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Histopathology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Current Concepts for Diagnosing Non-Dysplastic and Dysplastic Barrett's Esophagus.Gastrointestinal endoscopy clinics of North America · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Wladyslaw JanuszewiczEarly Cancer Institute, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8200-2661
Nastazja D PilonisEarly Cancer Institute, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Tarek SawasMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Richard PhillipsEarly Cancer Institute, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8978-9743
Maria O'DonovanDepartment of Histopathology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
Ahmad MiremadiDepartment of Histopathology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
Shalini MalhotraDepartment of Histopathology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
Monika TripathiDepartment of Histopathology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
Adrienn BlaskoEarly Cancer Institute, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
David A KatzkaMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Rebecca C FitzgeraldEarly Cancer Institute, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Massimiliano di PietroEarly Cancer Institute, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
University of Cambridge · GBAddenbrooke's Hospital · GBMayo Clinic · US

Funding

Biomedical Research Centre
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsBarrett's oesophagus with indefinite for dysplasia (BE-IND) is a subjective diagnosis with a low interobserver agreement (IOA) among pathologists and uncertain clinical implications. This study aimed to assess the utility of p53 immunohistochemistry (p53-IHC) in assessing BE-IND specimens. METHODS AND

resultsArchive endoscopic biopsies with a BE-IND diagnosis from two academic centres were analysed. First, haematoxylin and eosin-stained slides (H&E) were reviewed by four expert gastrointestinal (GI) pathologists allocated into two groups (A and B). After a washout period of at least 8 weeks, H&E slides were reassessed side-to-side with p53-IHC available. We compared the rate of changed diagnosis and the IOA for all BE grades before and after p53-IHC. We included 216 BE-IND specimens from 185 patients, 44.0 and 32.9% of which were confirmed after H&E slide revision by groups A and B, respectively. More than half the cases were reclassified to a non-dysplastic BE (NDBE), while 5.6% of cases in group A and 7.4% in group B were reclassified to definite dysplasia. The IOA for NDBE, BE-IND, low-grade dysplasia (LGD) and high-grade dysplasia (HGD)/intramucosal cancer (IMC) was 0.31, 0.21, -0.03 and -0.02, respectively. Use of p53-IHC led to a >40% reduction in BE-IND diagnoses (P < 0.001) and increased IOA for all BE grades [κ = 0.46 (NDBE), 0.26 (BE-IND), 0.49 (LGD), 0.35 (HGD/IMC)]. An aberrant p53-IHC pattern significantly increased the likelihood of reclassifying BE-IND to definite dysplasia (odds ratio = 44.3, 95% confidence interval = 18.8-113.0).

conclusionP53-IHC reduces the rate of BE-IND diagnoses and improves the IOA among pathologists when reporting BE with equivocal epithelial changes.

Indexed as

Barrett EsophagusEsophageal NeoplasmsPrecancerous ConditionsDisease ProgressionHumansHyperplasiaImmunohistochemistryTumor Suppressor Protein p53Tumor Suppressor Protein p53biomarkersclinical pathologyobserver variationsoesophageal neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID35274753
PMCPMC9321087
OpenAlexW4220963067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.