Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35274695›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of nutrition2022

The Conceptual Framework for the International Food Policy Study: Evaluating the Population-Level Impact of Food Policy.

David Hammond, Lana Vanderlee, Christine M White, Rachel B Acton, Martin White, Christina A Roberto, Adrian Cameron, Gary Sacks, Sharon Kirkpatrick, Joel Dubin and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of nutrition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

David HammondSchool of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8197-6010
Lana VanderleeÉcole de Nutrition, Centre Nutrition, santé et société (Centre NUTRISS), and Institut sur la nutrition et les aliments fonctionnels (INAF), Université Laval, Québec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5384-1821
Christine M WhiteSchool of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Rachel B ActonSchool of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Martin WhiteMedical Research Council Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1861-6757
Christina A RobertoDepartment of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Adrian CameronGlobal Obesity Centre, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
Gary SacksGlobal Obesity Centre, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9736-1539
Sharon KirkpatrickSchool of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Joel DubinDepartment Statistics and Actuarial Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada.
Jean AdamsMedical Research Council Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5733-7830
Alejandra JaureguiCentre for Health and Nutrition Research, National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Mexico.
James F ThrasherDepartment of Health Promotion, Education & Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.

Funding

CIHR PJT-162167Medical Research Council MC_UU_00006/7
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An unhealthy diet is among the leading global causes of death and disability. Globally, a range of policies are being implemented to support healthy food choices at a population level, including novel polices in the areas of food marketing, nutrition labeling, and taxation of less healthy foods. There is a need to evaluate and inform the implementation of these policies, including their impacts on marginalized population subgroups. The International Food Policy Study (IFPS) consists of repeated cross-sectional surveys conducted in 5 high- and upper-middle-income countries: Australia, Canada, Mexico, the United Kingdom, and the United States. In each country, approximately 4000 adults and 1200 children and youth (aged 10-17) were recruited from a global commercial panel to complete an online survey using consistent measures and methodologies across countries. The first annual IFPS surveys were conducted in 2017 with adults; annual surveys for young people aged 10-17 were launched in 2019 in the same countries, as well as in Chile. The design of the IFPS surveys creates a framework for evaluating "natural experiments" in food policies, including comparisons over time within countries implementing the policy and comparisons with countries in which the policy was not implemented. IFPS surveys have 3 primary areas of focus: 1) knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs associated with specific policies; 2) diet-related behaviors; and 3) dietary intake, including 24-hour dietary recalls for adults in 4 of the 5 countries. Surveys also assess food insecurity, income adequacy, sex and gender, race/ethnicity, and a range of other measures to assess trends among priority subgroups. Overall, the IFPS project has the potential to address important gaps in national monitoring surveys for dietary patterns, and to evaluate the impacts of novel food policies implemented in any of the 5 countries over the study period.

Indexed as

DietNutrition PolicyAdolescentAdultChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFood LabelingFood PreferencesHumansMaleUnited Statesbetween-country comparisonsdietary intakefood policy, nutrition policypolicy evaluationquasi-experimental study

Identifiers

PMID35274695
PMCPMC9188864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.