Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35274426›Full record

ArticleANZ journal of surgery2022

Outpatient transperineal prostate biopsy under local anaesthesia is safe, well tolerated and feasible.

Anne Hong, Sarah Hemmingway, David Wetherell, Brendan Dias, Homayoun Zargar

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ANZ journal of surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06987071 (Efficacy Of Acupuncture in Pain and Anxiety During Transperineal Prostate Biopsy), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06987071 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Efficacy Of Acupuncture in Pain and Anxiety During Transperineal Prostate Biopsy: A Prospective, Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorMedipol UniversityRan2025 to 2025Enrolled72ConditionsProstate Cancer, Pain Management, Acupuncture Analgesia, Prostate BiopsyArmsAcupuncture, sham acupuncture
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. [Efficiency and safety of transperineal prostate biopsy with a single access point].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2026
    Observational
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Targeted biopsy of the prostate.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anne HongDepartment of Urology, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7786-0605
Sarah HemmingwayFaculty of Business, Law and Arts, Southern Cross University, Lismore, New South Wales, Australia.
David WetherellDepartment of Urology, Western Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Brendan DiasDepartment of Urology, Western Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Homayoun ZargarDepartment of Urology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Funding

Mundipharma Pte Ltd
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTransperineal biopsy (TPB) of the prostate has been increasingly utilized as it has reduced infection risks. Traditionally however, it is performed under general anaesthesia, thus it carries a differing set of risks. Recently, new studies have performed TPB under local anaesthesia with success. In the present study, we explored our experience of performing TPB under local anaesthesia in an Australian cohort.

methodsIn this prospective study based at a metropolitan outpatient clinic, patients were provided with TPB under local anaesthesia. We assessed prostate cancer detection rates, complication rates and patient tolerability. Pain tolerability was assess using patient reported pain score on the visual analogue scale. Follow up data was collected at days 7 and 30 post-biopsy via telephone interview.

resultsA total of 48 patients were enrolled in this study between June 2020 and March 2021. Median age was 65.5 years and median PSA was 6.95 ng/mL. Clinically significant prostate cancer was detected in 58% of patients. During the procedure, pain scores were rated the highest during infiltration of local anaesthetic agent with a median score of 5. By the conclusion of the procedure, median pain score was 1. Vast majority of patients (85.4%) would opt for a repeat TPB under local anaesthesia should the need for prostate biopsy arise again. Two of our patients experienced infectious complications, and one experienced urinary retention.

conclusionOur data is in line with currently available data and confirms that TPB under local anaesthesia can be achieved in a safe and tolerable manner.

Indexed as

ProstateProstatic NeoplasmsAgedAnesthesia, LocalAustraliaBiopsyHumansImage-Guided BiopsyMaleOutpatientsPainPerineumProspective Studiesclinically significant prostate cancercomplicationsdetection ratelocal anaesthesiaprostate biopsytransperineal biopsy

Identifiers

PMID35274426
PMCPMC9314011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.