Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35274386›Full record

Observational studyEuropean journal of cancer care2022

Patient-reported participation in hepatopancreatobiliary surgery cancer care: A pilot intervention study with patient-owned fast-track protocols.

Awin Amin, Maria Nordén, Victoria Fomichov, Bergthor Björnsson, Anna Lindhoff Larsson, Per Sandström, Jenny Drott

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in European journal of cancer care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04061902 (Participation in Surgical Cancer Care; Patient, Next of Kin and Health Care Professionals' Perspective), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04061902 completednot on this map

Participation in Surgical Cancer Care; Patient, Next of Kin and Health Care Professionals' Perspective

TypeobservationalSponsorLinkoeping UniversityRan2016 to 2020Enrolled250ConditionsCancerArmsParticipation with enhanced patient perioperative information
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Awin AminDepartment of Surgery in Linköping, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Maria NordénDepartment of Urology in Linköping, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Victoria FomichovUnit for Public Health and Statistics, County Council of Östergötland, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Bergthor BjörnssonDepartment of Surgery in Linköping, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9704-1260
Anna Lindhoff LarssonDepartment of Surgery in Linköping, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Per SandströmDepartment of Surgery in Linköping, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8078-9528
Jenny DrottDepartment of Surgery in Linköping, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7601-6450

Funding

Medical Research Council of Southeast Sweden
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveFast-track concepts have been implemented in hepatopancreatobiliary surgery cancer care to improve postoperative recovery. For optimal postoperative care, patient participation is also required. The aim was to investigate and analyse whether an intervention with patient-owned fast-track protocols (PFTPs) may lead to increased patient participation and improve information for patients who underwent surgery for hepatopancreatobiliary cancer.

methodsA quantitative comparative design with a control and intervention group was used. The participants in the intervention group followed a PFTP during their admission. After discharge, the patients answered a questionnaire regarding patient participation. Data analyses were performed with descriptive statistics and ANCOVA.

resultsThe results are based on a total of 222 completed questionnaires: 116 in the control group and 106 in the intervention group. It is uncertain whether the PFTP increased patient participation and information, but its use may indicate an improvement for the patient group.

conclusionA successful implementation strategy for the use of PFTP, with daily reconciliations, could be part of the work required to improve overall satisfaction with patient participation. CLINICALTRIALS: gov ID: NCT04061902.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsPatient ParticipationHumansLength of StayPatient DischargePatient Reported Outcome MeasuresPilot ProjectsPostoperative Carefast-track surgeryhepatopancreatobiliary cancer surgeryinformationpatient participationrecoverysurgical care

Identifiers

PMID35274386
PMCPMC9542293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.