Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35274156›Full record

ArticleAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2022

Evaluation and optimization of PolyJet 3D-printed materials for cell culture studies.

Emily R Currens, Michael R Armbruster, Andre D Castiaux, James L Edwards, R Scott Martin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Emily R CurrensDepartment of Chemistry, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, 63103, USA.
Michael R ArmbrusterDepartment of Chemistry, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, 63103, USA.
Andre D CastiauxDepartment of Chemistry, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, 63103, USA.
James L EdwardsDepartment of Chemistry, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, 63103, USA.
R Scott MartinDepartment of Chemistry, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, 63103, USA. scott.martin@slu.edu.

Funding

From single molecule to microfluidic 3D tissue platforms: novel multiscale tools to investigate hyper-stimulated immune cells in the circulationR01NS105888 · NINDS · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Lane A. Baker, ROBERT Scott MARTIN · 2018 to 2026
$4.0M
Microchip-based Cell Reactor/Analysis SystemR15GM084470 · NIGMS · SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY · PI MARTIN, ROBERT SCOTT · 2008 to 2019
$1.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R15 GM084470NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS105888
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Use of 3D printing for microfluidics is a rapidly growing area, with applications involving cell culture in these devices also becoming of interest. 3D printing can be used to create custom-designed devices that have complex features and integrate different material types in one device; however, there are fewer studies studying the ability to culture cells on the various substrates that are available. This work describes the effect of PolyJet 3D-printing technology on cell culture of two cell lines, bovine pulmonary artery endothelial cells (BPAECs) and Madin-Darby Canine Kidney (MDCK) cells, on two different types of printed materials (VeroClear or MED610). It was found that untreated devices, when used for studies of 1 day or more, led to unsuccessful culture. A variety of device treatment methodologies were investigated, with the most success coming from the use of sodium hydroxide/sodium metasilicate solution. Devices treated with this cleaning step resulted in culture of BPAECs and MDCK cells that were more similar to what is obtained in traditional culture flasks (in terms of cell morphology, viability, and cell density). LC-MS/MS analysis (via Orbitrap MS) was used to determine potential leachates from untreated devices. Finally, the use of a fiber scaffold in the devices was utilized to further evaluate the treatment methodology and to also demonstrate the ability to perform 3D culture in such devices. This study will be of use for researchers wanting to utilize these or other cell types in PolyJet-based 3D-printed devices.

Indexed as

Endothelial CellsTandem Mass SpectrometryAnimalsCattleCell Culture TechniquesChromatography, LiquidDogsPrinting, Three-Dimensional3D printingCell systemsMicrofabricationMicrofluidicsSingle cell analysis

Identifiers

PMID35274156
PMCPMC9018575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.