Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35274097›Full record

ArticleAesthetic surgery journal. Open forum2022

Validation of Ideal Breast Characteristics With Breast Augmentation Patients.

Jason D Kelly, Bryan Comstock, Orr Shauly, James M Smartt, Daniel J Gould

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. The Effect of Wearing a Mask on Facial Attractiveness.Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jason D KellyLove My Delta, Inc., Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7800-4314
Bryan ComstockLove My Delta, Inc., Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Orr ShaulyDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
James M SmarttPhiladelphia, PA, USA.
Daniel J GouldKeck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3576-3775

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Breast augmentation procedures are one of the most commonly performed aesthetic procedures in the United States. Little work has focused on the general public's overall perception of the ideal breast or has validated them with patient photographs. Objectives: To validate crowdsourced perceptions of breasts with their alignment to the aesthetics of breast augmentation patients. Methods: A prospective cross-sectional study was performed using participants enrolled through the AmazonMechanical Turk crowdsourcing platform (Amazon Web Services, Amazon, Seattle, WA) to obtain participant opinions ofhow closely patient breasts aligned with previously obtained results of 4 ideal breast characteristics. Outcomes were reported based on the correlation between breast attractiveness and alignment to ideal breast characteristics, both before and after breast implant procedures. Results: 2306 responses from 737 participants reported patient photograph alignment with ideal breast projection proportion (1.0) as having the highest correlation to opinions of heightened aesthetic beauty ( Conclusions: Crowdsourcing can be a useful tool for aesthetic surgery preferences and has helped reveal key takeaways. The importance of the 4 breast characteristics has been validated, with alignment to all 4 characteristics tested having a high correlation to preferences. Differences in preference across demographic groups are a topic to further investigate.

Identifiers

PMID35274097
PMCPMC8905333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.