Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35274072›Full record

ArticleAPL bioengineering2022

Principles for the design of multicellular engineered living systems.

Onur Aydin, Austin P Passaro, Ritu Raman, Samantha E Spellicy, Robert P Weinberg, Roger D Kamm, Matthew Sample, George A Truskey, Jeremiah Zartman, Roy D Dar and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in APL bioengineering, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. 4D force patterning enables spatial control of angiogenesis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Motile Living Biobots Self-Construct from Adult Human Somatic Progenitor Seed Cells.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Austin P PassaroRegenerative Bioscience Center, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5449-3021
Ritu RamanDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA.
Samantha E Spellicy
Robert P WeinbergSchool of Pharmacy, Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.
Matthew SampleCenter for Ethics and Law in the Life Sciences, Leibniz Universität Hannover, 30167 Hannover, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5290-1458
George A TruskeyDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6885-4489
Jeremiah ZartmanDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana 46556, USA.
Roy D DarDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6006-4888
Sebastian PalaciosDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 02139, USA.
Jason WangDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801, USA.
Jesse TordoffComputational and Systems Biology Program, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA.
Nuria MontserratInstitute for Bioengineering of Catalonia (IBEC), The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology (BIST), 08028 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1603-1755
Rashid Bashir
M Taher A SaifDepartment of Mechanical Science and Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2152-5116

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Remarkable progress in bioengineering over the past two decades has enabled the formulation of fundamental design principles for a variety of medical and non-medical applications. These advancements have laid the foundation for building multicellular engineered living systems (M-CELS) from biological parts, forming functional modules integrated into living machines. These cognizant design principles for living systems encompass novel genetic circuit manipulation, self-assembly, cell-cell/matrix communication, and artificial tissues/organs enabled through systems biology, bioinformatics, computational biology, genetic engineering, and microfluidics. Here, we introduce design principles and a blueprint for forward production of robust and standardized M-CELS, which may undergo variable reiterations through the classic design-build-test-debug cycle. This Review provides practical and theoretical frameworks to forward-design, control, and optimize novel M-CELS. Potential applications include biopharmaceuticals, bioreactor factories, biofuels, environmental bioremediation, cellular computing, biohybrid digital technology, and experimental investigations into mechanisms of multicellular organisms normally hidden inside the "black box" of living cells.

Identifiers

PMID35274072
PMCPMC8893975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.