Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35274044›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical education and curricular development

Medical Student Portfolios: A Systematic Scoping Review.

Rei Tan, Jacquelin Jia Qi Ting, Daniel Zhihao Hong, Annabelle Jia Sing Lim, Yun Ting Ong, Anushka Pisupati, Eleanor Jia Xin Chong, Min Chiam, Alexia Sze Inn Lee, Laura Hui Shuen Tan and 4 more

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical education and curricular development. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Discoveries or doubts: a qualitative study of the transformative potential of portfolio meetings.Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Short note on reflective writing.Bioinformation · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Rei TanYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Jacquelin Jia Qi TingYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Daniel Zhihao HongYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Annabelle Jia Sing LimYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Yun Ting OngYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Anushka PisupatiYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Eleanor Jia Xin ChongYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Min ChiamDivision of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore.
Alexia Sze Inn LeeDivision of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore.
Laura Hui Shuen TanDivision of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore.
Annelissa Mien Chew ChinMedical library, National University of Singapore libraries, Singapore.
Limin WijayaDuke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Warren FongYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Lalit Kumar Radha KrishnaYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phenomenon: Medical Student Portfolios (MSP)s allow medical students to reflect and better appreciate their clinical, research and academic experiences which promotes their individual personal and professional development. However, differences in adoption rate, content design and practice setting create significant variability in their employ. With MSPs increasingly used to evaluate professional competencies and the student's professional identity formation (PIF), this has become an area of concern. Approach: We adopt Krishna's Systematic Evidence-Based Approach to carry out a Systematic Scoping Review (SSR in SEBA) on MSPs. The structured search process of six databases, concurrent use of thematic and content analysis in the Split Approach and comparisons of the themes and categories with the tabulated summaries of included articles in the Jigsaw Perspective and Funnelling Process offers enhanced transparency and reproducibility to this review. Findings: The research team retrieved 14501 abstracts, reviewed 779 full-text articles and included 96 articles. Similarities between the themes, categories and tabulated summaries allowed the identification of the following funnelled domains: Purpose of MSPs, Content and structure of MSPs, Strengths and limitations of MSPs, Methods to improve MSPs, and Use of E-portfolios. Insights: Variability in the employ of MSPs arise as a result of a failure to recognise its different roles and uses. Here we propose additional roles of MSPs, in particular, building on a consistent set of content materials and assessments of milestones called micro-competencies. Whislt generalised micro-competencies assess achievement of general milestones expected of all medical students, personalised micro-competencies record attainment of particular skills, knowledge and attitudes balanced against the medical student's abilities, context and needs. This combination of micro-competencies in a consistent framework promises a holistic, authentic and longitudinal perspective of the medical student's development and maturing PIF.

Indexed as

assessmentcurriculumlearningmedical studentmedical student portfolioportfolioreflection

Identifiers

PMID35274044
PMCPMC8902199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.