Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35273876›Full record

ArticleCureus2022

Utilization of a National Writing Challenge to Promote Scholarly Work: A Pilot Study.

Angela Keniston, Maria Frank, Lauren McBeth, Ebrahim Barkoudah, Juliessa Pavon, Nidhi Rohatgi, Valerie Vaughn, Sanjay Bhandari, Marisha Burden

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Angela KenistonDivision of Hospital Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, USA.
Maria FrankDivision of Hospital Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, USA.
Lauren McBethDivision of Hospital Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, USA.
Ebrahim BarkoudahHospital Medicine Unit, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
Juliessa PavonDivision of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Duke University, Geriatrics Research Education Clinical Center, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System (VAHCS), Durham, USA.
Nidhi RohatgiDivision of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, USA.
Valerie VaughnDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Health System Innovation & Research, Department of Population Health Science, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, USA.
Sanjay BhandariDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, USA.
Marisha BurdenDivision of Hospital Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Hospitalists value mentorship and scholarly work, yet often struggle to find time and mentors amid busy clinical workloads. Objective To help catalyze writing for hospitalists nationally, we created a Writing Challenge, where we asked hospitalists to commit to the goal of writing 400 words a day, four days a week, for four weeks. Methods Prospective, programmatic evaluation with daily logs followed by a survey at the completion of the project. The four-week Writing Challenge occurred between June 7 and July 5, 2021. Email invitations to participate in the challenge were disseminated to peer networks, and the challenge was promoted using social media. Participants agreed to attempt to write 400 words per day, four days per week, for four weeks. Results Seventy-four individuals from 28 institutions registered for the Writing Challenge, with 36 (49%) participating in the challenge by logging their writing. Participants wrote an average of 4,372 +/- 4,324 words during the challenge. Sixty-eight percent of the participants reported that their amount of writing increased during the challenge and 50% of the participants stated they planned to publish their work, though many participants (46%) reported struggling to write each day. Conclusions The Writing Challenge is one way to generate increased writing and may result in increased scholarly output for academic hospitalists.

Indexed as

academic hospitalistacademic writingfaculty advancementscholarshipwriting challenge

Identifiers

PMID35273876
PMCPMC8900829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.