Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35273817›Full record

ReviewFood science and biotechnology2022

Pressure moisture treatment and hydro-thermal treatment of starch.

Hui-Yun Kim, Moo-Yeol Baik

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Food science and biotechnology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Characteristics of physically modified starches.Food science and biotechnology · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hui-Yun KimDepartment of Food Science and Biotechnology, Institute of Life Science and Resources, Kyung Hee University, Yongin, 17104 South Korea.
Moo-Yeol BaikDepartment of Food Science and Biotechnology, Institute of Life Science and Resources, Kyung Hee University, Yongin, 17104 South Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-3779-3369

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Starch is often subjected to denaturation treatment to improve its useful properties and eliminate its shortcomings. Various methods have been developed to produce modified starches with different properties and for a variety of uses. Because physically modified starch can be produced without chemical substances or biological agents, the modification method is very simple and inexpensive, and the resulting material can be used as clean label starch. Among these physical modification technologies, heat moisture treatment (HMT) is a universally valid technology, but little is known about pressure moisture treatment (PMT)-related technology. Physical modification of starch using PMT results in new functions and value-added characteristics required by industry, and PMT has the potential to produce starch with new functions. In this paper, PMT-related technologies for physically modified starch, the difference between PMT and the hydro-thermal treatment, and clean label starch manufacturing using HMT and PMT were investigated.

Indexed as

Clean label starchHeat moisture treatmentPhysically modified starchPressure moisture treatment

Identifiers

PMID35273817
PMCPMC8885952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.