Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35273809›Full record

ArticleMultiple sclerosis journal - experimental, translational and clinical

Perspectives and experiences with COVID-19 vaccines in people with MS.

John R Ciotti, Dana C Perantie, Brandon P Moss, Kathryn C Fitzgerald, Jeffrey A Cohen, Ellen M Mowry, Robert T Naismith, Salim Chahin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Multiple sclerosis journal - experimental, translational and clinical. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Attitudes toward coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination in people with multiple sclerosis.Multiple sclerosis journal - experimental, translational and clinical
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

John R CiottiDepartment of Neurology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5696-8841
Dana C PerantieDepartment of Neurology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6380-8133
Brandon P MossMellen Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5319-5129
Kathryn C FitzgeraldDepartment of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3137-0322
Jeffrey A CohenMellen Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9245-9772
Ellen M MowryDepartment of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Robert T NaismithDepartment of Neurology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Salim ChahinDepartment of Neurology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Washington University in St. Louis · USCleveland Clinic · USJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: People with MS may have unique perspectives on COVID-19 vaccines due to their condition and/or medications. Objective: Assess perspectives and experiences with COVID-19 vaccination, and quantify variables impacting COVID-19 vaccine willingness in people with MS. Methods: A survey captured demographics, MS characteristics, and COVID-19 infection and exposures data; opinions on COVID-19 vaccine safety, side effects, and efficacy; and experiences following vaccination. Chi-square tests and a logistic regression model were used to denote between-group differences and variables predicting vaccine willingness, respectively. Results: Most (87.8%) of the 237 participants were willing to receive the vaccine. Fifteen percent held or delayed a DMT dose for vaccination. MS symptoms worsened in a minority (7.6% first/only dose; 14.7% second dose), and most side effects were mild (80.0%; 55.3%). Those not planning to receive the vaccine were primarily concerned with long-term safety (70.4%). Medical comorbidities (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]=5.222; p=0.04) and following infection prevention precautions (aOR=6.330; p=0.008) were associated with vaccine willingness. Conclusion: Most individuals with MS surveyed plan to receive the COVID-19 vaccine. People with MS experience similar side effects to the general population, and few experience transient MS symptom worsening. These results can inform conversations on vaccination between providers and people with MS.

Indexed as

COVID-19Multiple sclerosisvaccine

Identifiers

PMID35273809
PMCPMC8902317
OpenAlexW4221064900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.