Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35273667›Full record

ArticlePaediatrics & child health2022

The clinical effect of glucose meter selection upon the detection of neonatal hypoglycemia.

Kayla Parker, Martha E Lyon, Barry D Kyle, Lannae Strueby, Mark Inman

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Paediatrics & child health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Blood Glucose Monitoring in the Neonatal Period: A Study on Evaluation Using the RAPIDPoint 500/500e.Pediatrics international : official journal of the Japan Pediatric Society
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kayla ParkerDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Martha E LyonDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Division of Clinical Biochemistry, Saskatchewan Health Authority, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Barry D KyleDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Division of Clinical Biochemistry, Saskatchewan Health Authority, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Lannae StruebyDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Mark InmanDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
University of Saskatchewan · CASaskatchewan Health · CASaskatchewan Health Authority · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neonatal hypoglycemia is a common, transitional metabolic state that may lead to poor neurodevelopmental outcomes if unrecognized or managed inadequately. Given its frequency of presentation and immense clinical significance, a myriad of clinical practice guidelines have been published outlining appropriate screening, diagnosis, and treatment principles-many endorsing the use of glucose point-of-care testing (POCT). Unfortunately, the well-intended 'march' toward POCT, with bedside glucose meters as screening devices in the NICU, has resulted in unintended consequences with critical implications: a lack of international traceability to the 'gold' standard glucose method by POCT devices, under-recognition of POCT limitations, and a reliance upon a technology primarily driven to detect hyperglycemia in the adult population as opposed to neonatal hypoglycemia. As providers continue to advocate for improved POCT, there must be robust communication between providers and the clinical laboratory in the selection, standardization, and interpretation of glucose POCT to ensure optimal neonatal glucose detection.

Indexed as

HypoglycemiaNeonatePoint-of-care testingScreening

Identifiers

PMID35273667
PMCPMC8900683
OpenAlexW3205045016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.