Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35273559›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neurology2022

Electroencephalogram (EEG) With or Without Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) as Biomarkers for Post-stroke Recovery: A Narrative Review.

Zafer Keser, Samuel C Buchl, Nathan A Seven, Matej Markota, Heather M Clark, David T Jones, Giuseppe Lanzino, Robert D Brown, Gregory A Worrell, Brian N Lundstrom

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. BDNF Val66Met polymorphism modulates early TMS-EEG plasticity and rTMS efficacy in patients with anterior circulation ischemic stroke.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. [Applications and prospects of electroencephalography technology in neurorehabilitation assessment and treatment].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2024
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zafer KeserDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
Samuel C BuchlDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
Nathan A SevenDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
Matej MarkotaDepartment of Psychiatry, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
Heather M ClarkDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
David T JonesDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
Giuseppe LanzinoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
Robert D BrownDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
Gregory A WorrellDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
Brian N LundstromDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
Mayo Clinic in Arizona · US

Funding

Localizing value and underlying mechanisms of low frequency EEG for focal epilepsyK23NS112339 · NINDS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI LUNDSTROM, BRIAN NILS · 2019 to 2023
$935k
NINDS NIH HHS K23 NS112339
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stroke is one of the leading causes of death and disability. Despite the high prevalence of stroke, characterizing the acute neural recovery patterns that follow stroke and predicting long-term recovery remains challenging. Objective methods to quantify and characterize neural injury are still lacking. Since neuroimaging methods have a poor temporal resolution, EEG has been used as a method for characterizing post-stroke recovery mechanisms for various deficits including motor, language, and cognition as well as predicting treatment response to experimental therapies. In addition, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), a form of non-invasive brain stimulation, has been used in conjunction with EEG (TMS-EEG) to evaluate neurophysiology for a variety of indications. TMS-EEG has significant potential for exploring brain connectivity using focal TMS-evoked potentials and oscillations, which may allow for the system-specific delineation of recovery patterns after stroke. In this review, we summarize the use of EEG alone or in combination with TMS in post-stroke motor, language, cognition, and functional/global recovery. Overall, stroke leads to a reduction in higher frequency activity (≥8 Hz) and intra-hemispheric connectivity in the lesioned hemisphere, which creates an activity imbalance between non-lesioned and lesioned hemispheres. Compensatory activity in the non-lesioned hemisphere leads mostly to unfavorable outcomes and further aggravated interhemispheric imbalance. Balanced interhemispheric activity with increased intrahemispheric coherence in the lesioned networks correlates with improved post-stroke recovery. TMS-EEG studies reveal the clinical importance of cortical reactivity and functional connectivity within the sensorimotor cortex for motor recovery after stroke. Although post-stroke motor studies support the prognostic value of TMS-EEG, more studies are needed to determine its utility as a biomarker for recovery across domains including language, cognition, and hemispatial neglect. As a complement to MRI-based technologies, EEG-based technologies are accessible and valuable non-invasive clinical tools in stroke neurology.

Indexed as

EEGfunctional connectivityrecoverystrokeTMS-EEG

Identifiers

PMID35273559
PMCPMC8902309
OpenAlexW4212985175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.