Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35273471›Full record

ArticleDose-response : a publication of International Hormesis Society

Radiotherapy Combined With Concurrent Nedaplatin-Based Chemotherapy for Stage II-III Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Huiping Zhu, Xiaoling Lu, Jian Jiang, Jingfeng Lu, Xinchen Sun, Yun Zuo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dose-response : a publication of International Hormesis Society. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Huiping ZhuDepartment of Oncology, the Affiliated Zhangjiagang Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Xiaoling LuDepartment of Oncology, the Affiliated Zhangjiagang Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Jian JiangDepartment of Oncology, the Affiliated Zhangjiagang Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Jingfeng LuDepartment of Oncology, the Affiliated Zhangjiagang Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Xinchen SunDepartment of Radiation Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Yun ZuoDepartment of Oncology, the Affiliated Zhangjiagang Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6946-9614
Soochow University · CNJiangsu Province Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study was conducted to explore the appropriate radical radiation dose in concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for patients with inoperable stage II-III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Methods: This retrospective study included patients with esophageal cancer (EC) from the database of patients treated at the Affiliated Zhangjiagang Hospital of Soochow University (1/2015-12/2019). Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective remission rate (ORR), first failure pattern, and toxicities were collected. Results: 112 patients treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) combined with concurrent chemotherapy of nedaplatin-based regimens were included. Fifty-eight (51.8%) and 54 (48.2%) patients received 60 (HD) and 50.4 (LD) Gy of radiotherapy, respectively. The HD group showed superior OS and a trend for longer PFS compared with the LD group (median OS: 25.5 vs 17.5 months, P = .021; median PFS: 14.0 vs 10.5 months, P = .076). There were more patients with a complete remission (CR) in the HD group than in the LD group (P=.016). The treatment-related toxicities were generally acceptable, but HD radiotherapy would increase the incidence of grade ≥3 late radiotoxicity (22.4% vs 5.6%, P = .011). Conclusion: In nedaplatin-based CCRT for stage II-III ESCC, the radiotherapy dose of 60 Gy achieved a better prognosis. Strengths and limitations of this study: A comparative study of 50.4 Gy and 60 Gy was conducted to evaluate whether 50.4 Gy can be used as a radical radiotherapy dose for inoperable stage II-III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma from a real-world perspective.The highly consistent selection criteria in our study make analysis results highly reliable and scientific.The existing research results support that nedaplatin can be used in concurrent chemoradiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, and this study focuses on the discovery of a better nedaplatin-based combination regimen.The findings of this study are limited to a single-center study with a non-large sample size.Inevitably, recall bias may exist in this retrospective study.Surgery was not involved in the follow-up treatment after concurrent chemoradiotherapy, which may worsen the prognosis of some patients.

Indexed as

concurrent chemoradiotherapydose fractionationEsophageal squamous cell carcinomanedaplatinradiation

Identifiers

PMID35273471
PMCPMC8902195
OpenAlexW4214833017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.