Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35273470›Full record

ArticleIEEE sensors journal2022

Joint Optimization of Kinematics and Anthropometrics for Human Motion Denoising.

Le Zhou, Nate Lannan, Guoliang Fan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE sensors journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. A Review of Depth-Based Human Motion Enhancement: Past and Present.IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Le ZhouElectrical Engineering Department, Oklahoma state university, Stillwater, OK 74075 USA.
Nate LannanElectrical Engineering Department, Oklahoma state university, Stillwater, OK 74075 USA.
Guoliang FanElectrical Engineering Department, Oklahoma state university, Stillwater, OK 74075 USA.

Funding

CATcare: Cognitive Assistive Technology for Dementia HomecareR15AG061833 · NIA · OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY STILLWATER · PI FAN, GUOLIANG · 2019 to 2019
$438k
NIA NIH HHS R15 AG061833
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a novel technique for human motion denoising by jointly optimizing kinematic and anthropometric constraints for a noisy skeleton data. Specifically, we are focused on depth-sensor-based motion capture (D-Mocap) data that are often prone to error, outliers and distortion. To capture human kinematics, we first propose a joint-level Tobit particle filter (TPF) that incorporates a unique observation model to characterize the censored measurement of D-Mocap data. A skeleton-level Differential Evolution (DE) algorithm is then integrated with the sequential Monte Carlo sampling in the TPF, allowing joint-level particles to be re-distributed and re-weighted according to the stability and consistency of skeletal bone lengths as well as the suitability of joint kinematics. This leads to an integrated TPF-DE algorithm that significantly improves the quality of D-Mocap data by making 3D joint trajectories more kinematically admissible and anthropometrically stable. Experimental results on both simulated and real-world D-Mocap show that the errors of joint positions and the bone lengths have been reduced by 30-60%, and the accuracy of joint angles has been improved by 40-60%. The proposed TPF-DE method outperforms the recent filtering-based and deep learning methods and demonstrate the synergy between the TPF and DE algorithms for effective human motion enhancement.

Indexed as

Differential EvolutionD-MocapMotion captureparticle filterTobit model

Identifiers

PMID35273470
PMCPMC8903306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.