Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35273382›Full record

ArticleHeredity2022

Introgressive hybridisation between domestic pigs (Sus scrofa domesticus) and endemic Corsican wild boars (S. s. meridionalis): effects of human-mediated interventions.

Anna Schleimer, Lorraine Richart, Frank Drygala, François Casabianca, Oscar Maestrini, Hannah Weigand, Chantal Schwartz, Michel Mittelbronn, Alain C Frantz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heredity, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Anna SchleimerMusée National d'Histoire Naturelle, 25 rue Munster, L-2160, Luxembourg, Luxembourg. schleimer.anna@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9798-5074
Lorraine RichartNational Center of Pathology (NCP), Laboratoire National de Santé (LNS), 3555, Dudelange, Luxembourg.
Frank DrygalaMusée National d'Histoire Naturelle, 25 rue Munster, L-2160, Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
François CasabiancaINRAE Laboratoire de Recherches sur le Développement de l'Elevage, Quartier Grossetti, 20250, Corte, France.
Oscar MaestriniINRAE Laboratoire de Recherches sur le Développement de l'Elevage, Quartier Grossetti, 20250, Corte, France.
Hannah WeigandMusée National d'Histoire Naturelle, 25 rue Munster, L-2160, Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
Chantal SchwartzNational Center of Pathology (NCP), Laboratoire National de Santé (LNS), 3555, Dudelange, Luxembourg.
Michel MittelbronnNational Center of Pathology (NCP), Laboratoire National de Santé (LNS), 3555, Dudelange, Luxembourg.
Alain C FrantzMusée National d'Histoire Naturelle, 25 rue Munster, L-2160, Luxembourg, Luxembourg.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Owing to the intensified domestication process with artificial trait selection, introgressive hybridisation between domestic and wild species poses a management problem. Traditional free-range livestock husbandry, as practiced in Corsica and Sardinia, is known to facilitate hybridisation between wild boars and domestic pigs (Sus scrofa). Here, we assessed the genetic distinctness and genome-wide domestic pig ancestry levels of the Corsican wild boar subspecies S. s. meridionalis, with reference to its Sardinian conspecifics, employing a genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) assay and mitochondrial control region (mtCR) haplotypes. We also assessed the reliance of morphological criteria and the melanocortin-1 receptor (MC1R) coat colour gene to identify individuals with domestic introgression. While Corsican wild boars showed closest affinity to Sardinian and Italian wild boars compared to other European populations based on principal component analysis, the observation of previously undescribed mtCR haplotypes and high levels of nuclear divergence (Weir's θ > 0.14) highlighted the genetic distinctness of Corsican S. s. meridionalis. Across three complementary analyses of mixed ancestry (i.e., STRUCTURE, PCADMIX, and ELAI), proportions of domestic pig ancestry were estimated at 9.5% in Corsican wild boars, which was significantly higher than in wild boars in Sardinia, where free-range pig keeping was banned in 2012. Comparison of morphologically pure- and hybrid-looking Corsican wild boars suggested a weak correlation between morphological criteria and genome-wide domestic pig ancestry. The study highlights the usefulness of molecular markers to assess the direct impacts of management practices on gene flow between domestic and wild species.

Indexed as

Gene FlowSus scrofaAnimalsGenetic IntrogressionHaplotypesHumansHybridization, GeneticSwine

Identifiers

PMID35273382
PMCPMC8986821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.