Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35273346›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Electromyography of the muscle spindle.

Juhani V Partanen, Jukka Vanhanen, Sara K Liljander

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Muscle spindles as pain receptors.BMJ neurology open · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Juhani V PartanenDepartment of Clinical Neurophysiology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, P.O. Box 800, 00029, Hus, Finland. junipartanen@gmail.com.
Jukka VanhanenDepartment of Clinical Neurophysiology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, P.O. Box 800, 00029, Hus, Finland.
Sara K LiljanderDepartment of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University School of Science, P.O. Box 12200, 00076, Aalto, Finland.
Aalto University · FIHelsinki University Hospital · FIUniversity of Helsinki · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In needle electromyography, there are two spontaneous waveforms, miniature end plate potentials and "end plate spikes", appearing usually together. Miniature end plate potentials are local, non-propagating postsynaptic waves, caused by spontaneous exocytosis of acetylcholine in the neuromuscular junction. The prevailing hypothesis states that "end plate spikes" are propagated postsynaptic action potentials of muscle fibers, caused by presynaptic irritation of the motor nerve or nerve terminal. Using several small concentric needle electrodes in parallel with the muscle fibers, most "end plate spikes" are strictly local or propagating for 2-4 mm. At the end plate zone, there are miniature end plate potentials without "end plate spikes". Local "end plate spikes" are junctional potentials of intrafusal gamma neuromuscular junctions of the nuclear bag fibers, and propagated "end plate spikes" are potentials of nuclear chain muscle fibers of muscle spindles. Miniature end plate potentials without "end plate spikes" at the end plate zone derive from alpha neuromuscular junctions. These findings contrast with the prevailing hypothesis. The history of observations and different hypotheses of the origin of end plate spikes are described.

Indexed as

Motor EndplateMuscle SpindlesAction PotentialsElectromyographyNeuromuscular Junction

Identifiers

PMID35273346
PMCPMC8913790
OpenAlexW4220922449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.