ArticleScientific reports2022
Zooplankton network conditioned by turbidity gradient in small anthropogenic reservoirs.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Spatial-Temporal Dynamics and Co-Occurrence Networks of Zooplankton Community Structure in a Large Shallow Reservoir Under the Background of Ecological Restoration.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Indices of trophic and competitive relationships in a planktonic meta-network of carp ponds.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Taxonomic, functional and interspecific response of zooplankton to management practices in carp ponds.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Water beetle networks differences and migration between natural lakes and post-exploitation water bodies.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Zooplankton functional diversity as a bioindicator of freshwater ecosystem health across land use gradient.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- The response of zooplankton network indicators to winter water warming using shallow artificial reservoirs as model case study.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Biotechnologies for bulk production of microalgal biomass: from mass cultivation to dried biomass acquisition.Biotechnology for biofuels and bioproducts · 2023Review
- Regional differences in water beetle communities networks settling in dystrophic lakes in northern Poland.Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Water turbidity can significantly influence interspecific interactions in aquatic ecosystems. We tested the hypothesis that the turbidity gradient significantly differentiates the dynamics, significance and type of relationships in the structure of zooplankton communities colonizing mine pit reservoirs. The interactions between zooplankton species were evaluated by network graph analysis for three water turbidity classes: high turbidity (HT), moderate turbidity (MT) and low turbidity (LT). The HT network was most cohesive, and it was controlled by taxa grazing on various food sources within one ecological niche (Polyarthra longiremis, Brachionus angularis, Cyclops vicinus, Codonella cratera) and the positive and negative relationships between them were balanced. The MT biocenotic network was composed of three sub-networks connected by nodes with high communication attributes (Polyarthra vulgaris, Bosmina longirostris, C. vicinus), and antagonistic interactions (predation and competition) were less important. The LT network was most heterogeneous, and Daphnia cuculllata exerted the strongest influence on the network's structure by forming numerous positive (coexistence with predators) and negative (interference competition with microphagous rotifers) interspecific relationships. The study provides new information about the ecology of aquatic ecosystems, that are disturbed by changes in water turbidity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.