Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35273314›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Assessment of quality of alcohol-based hand sanitizers used in Johannesburg area during the CoViD-19 pandemic.

Puleng Matatiele, Bianca Southon, Boitumelo Dabula, Talulani Marageni, Poobalan Poongavanum, Boitumelo Kgarebe

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Assessment of Anti-Bacterial Effectiveness of Hand Sanitizers Commonly Used in South Africa.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Puleng MatatieleAnalytical Services, National Institute for Occupational Health, National Health Laboratory Service, P.O. Box 4788, Johannesburg, South Africa. PulengM@nioh.ac.za.
Bianca SouthonAnalytical Services, National Institute for Occupational Health, National Health Laboratory Service, P.O. Box 4788, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Boitumelo DabulaAnalytical Services, National Institute for Occupational Health, National Health Laboratory Service, P.O. Box 4788, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Talulani MarageniAnalytical Services, National Institute for Occupational Health, National Health Laboratory Service, P.O. Box 4788, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Poobalan PoongavanumAnalytical Services, National Institute for Occupational Health, National Health Laboratory Service, P.O. Box 4788, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Boitumelo KgarebeAnalytical Services, National Institute for Occupational Health, National Health Laboratory Service, P.O. Box 4788, Johannesburg, South Africa.
National Health Laboratory Service · ZANational Institute for Occupational Health · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the outbreak of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (CoViD-19), the World Health Organization has recommended that, in absence of soap and water, alcohol-based hand sanitizer can be used to prevent the transmission of coronaviruses. Unfortunately, many media and anecdotal reports indicate that many alcohol-based hand sanitizers sold in South Africa are substandard and some contain potentially toxic ingredients. The study aimed to identify hand sanitizers used in the Johannesburg area during the CoViD-19 pandemic that do not contain the recommended alcohol concentration of at least 70% propanol or 60% ethanol, and contain traces of toxic ingredients. Hand sanitizers randomly collected from various traders around Johannesburg were analyzed using Agilent auto sampler coupled to a gas chromatograph utilizing flame ionisation detection. Of the 94 hand sanitizer samples collected, three preparations contained no alcohol, whereas the rest contained either ethanol, 2-propanol or 1-propanol or a combination of two alcohols. Of the alcohol-containing hand sanitizers, 37 (41%) contained less than 60% alcohol. Ethyl acetate, isobutanol and other non-recommended alcohols (methanol and 3-methyl-butanol) were also identified. Consumers are therefore warned that among the many brands of hand sanitizers found around Johannesburg, there are some substandard preparations and some that contain traces of toxic ingredients.

Indexed as

COVID-19Quality ControlAlcoholsChromatography, GasHand SanitizersSouth AfricaAlcoholsHand Sanitizers

Identifiers

PMID35273314
PMCPMC8908948
OpenAlexW4221120099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.