Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35273217›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

A SARS-CoV-2 Wuhan spike virosome vaccine induces superior neutralization breadth compared to one using the Beta spike.

Yme U van der Velden, Marloes Grobben, Tom G Caniels, Judith A Burger, Meliawati Poniman, Melissa Oomen, Esther Siteur-van Rijnstra, Khadija Tejjani, Denise Guerra, Ronald Kempers and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Yme U van der Velden *Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Institute for Infection and Immunity, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Marloes Grobben *Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Institute for Infection and Immunity, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Tom G CanielsDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Institute for Infection and Immunity, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Judith A BurgerDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Institute for Infection and Immunity, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Meliawati PonimanDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Institute for Infection and Immunity, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Melissa OomenDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Institute for Infection and Immunity, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Esther Siteur-van RijnstraExperimental Immunology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Institute for Infection and Immunity, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Khadija TejjaniDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Institute for Infection and Immunity, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Denise GuerraDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Institute for Infection and Immunity, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ronald KempersMymetics BV, JH Oortweg 21, 2333 CH, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Toon StegmannMymetics BV, JH Oortweg 21, 2333 CH, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Marit J van GilsDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Institute for Infection and Immunity, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Rogier W SandersDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Institute for Infection and Immunity, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. r.w.sanders@amsterdamumc.nl.
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLUniversity of Amsterdam · NLCornell University · US

Funding

Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation OPP1111923
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are effective, but long-term protection is threatened by the emergence of virus variants. We generated a virosome vaccine containing the Beta spike protein and compared its immunogenicity in mice to a virosome vaccine containing the original Wuhan spike. Two administrations of the virosomes induced potent SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies in both vaccine groups. The level of autologous neutralization in Beta-vaccinated mice was similar to the level of autologous neutralization in Wuhan-vaccinated mice. However, heterologous neutralization to the Wuhan strain in Beta-vaccinated mice was 4.7-fold lower than autologous neutralization, whereas heterologous neutralization to the Beta strain in Wuhan-vaccinated mice was reduced by only 1.9-fold compared to autologous neutralization levels. In addition, neutralizing activity against the D614G, Alpha and Delta variants was also significantly lower after Beta spike vaccination than after Wuhan spike vaccination. Our results show that Beta spike vaccination induces inferior neutralization breadth. These results are informative for programs aimed to develop broadly active SARS-CoV-2 vaccines.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, NeutralizingBreath TestsCOVID-19 VaccinesFemaleMiceMice, Inbred BALB CNeutralization TestsSARS-CoV-2Spike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusVaccines, VirosomeAntibodies, NeutralizingCOVID-19 VaccinesSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2Vaccines, Virosome

Identifiers

PMID35273217
PMCPMC8913678
OpenAlexW4221005337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.