Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35273203›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Single tunnel technique versus coracoid sling technique for arthroscopic treatment of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation.

Liangquan Peng, Yizi Zheng, Siyu Chen, Shiwei Yang, Junjie Liu, Chao Cheng, Greg Zhang, Zhenhan Deng

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Liangquan PengDepartment of Sports Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital, Shenzhen, 518035, Guangdong, China.
Yizi ZhengGuangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanning, 530229, Guangxi, China.
Siyu ChenGuangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanning, 530229, Guangxi, China.
Shiwei YangTeaching Office, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital, Shenzhen, 518035, Guangdong, China.
Junjie LiuDepartment of Orthopedics, Shenzhen Shekou People's Hospital, Shenzhen, 518067, Guangdong, China.
Chao ChengDepartment of Orthopaedics, Yiyang Central Hospital, Yiyang, 413000, Hunan, China.
Greg ZhangMcGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, 77054, USA.
Zhenhan DengDepartment of Sports Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital, Shenzhen, 518035, Guangdong, China. dengzhenhan@email.szu.edu.cn.
Shenzhen Second People's Hospital · CNGuangxi University of Chinese Medicine · CNShenZhen People’s Hospital · CNThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · USYichang Central People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To evaluate and compare the efficacy of two techniques for the treatment of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation, the charts of 60 patients diagnosed with acute Rockwood type IV and V acromioclavicular joint dislocation that undergone arthroscopic fixation procedure with single tunnel technique (N = 30, 30.7 ± 5.7 years old) or coracoid sling technique (N = 30, 30.1 ± 5.4 years old) fixation were retrospectively reviewed. The Visual Analog Scale pain score, Constant shoulder functionality score, Karlsson acromioclavicular joint score, the time of return to sports and activity, and plain radiographs of the affected shoulder at different time points of follow-up were recorded for a minimum of 2 years post-op. The majority of the patients recovered to their preoperative activity levels with few complications. The average postoperative acromioclavicular and coracoclavicular distances were significantly narrower than preoperative measurements in both groups without significant difference between the two groups at 2 years post-op (P < 0.05). The coracoid sling technique group had reduced operative time, shorter time of recovery of shoulder movements, higher Constant functionality scores and Karlsson acromioclavicular joint scores, and fewer complications than the single tunnel technique group at the last follow-up (P < 0.05). Therefore, coracoid sling technique achieved superior clinical outcomes with fewer complications compared to the traditional single tunnel technique in arthroscopic treatment of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation.

Indexed as

Acromioclavicular JointJoint DislocationsShoulder DislocationAdultHumansRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID35273203
PMCPMC8913784
OpenAlexW4220782318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.