Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35273163›Full record

ReviewNature communications2022

Self-healing oxygen evolution catalysts.

Agnes E Thorarinsdottir, Samuel S Veroneau, Daniel G Nocera

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Enabling Solar Water Oxidation by BiVOJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. On the Tracks to "Smart" Single-Atom Catalysts.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Agnes E Thorarinsdottir *Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, 02138, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9378-4454
Samuel S Veroneau *Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, 02138, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5307-4124
Daniel G NoceraDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, 02138, USA. dnocera@fas.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5055-320X

Funding

U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) DE-SC0017619
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electrochemical and photoelectrochemical water splitting offers a scalable approach to producing hydrogen from renewable sources for sustainable energy storage. Depending on the applications, oxygen evolution catalysts (OECs) may perform water splitting under a variety of conditions. However, low stability and/or activity present challenges to the design of OECs, prompting the design of self-healing OECs composed of earth-abundant first-row transition metal oxides. The concept of self-healing catalysis offers a new tool to be employed in the design of stable and functionally active OECs under operating conditions ranging from acidic to basic solutions and from a variety of water sources.

Identifiers

PMID35273163
PMCPMC8913742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.