Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35273146›Full record

ArticleNature communications2022

Improved prediction of protein-protein interactions using AlphaFold2.

Patrick Bryant, Gabriele Pozzati, Arne Elofsson

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 558 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
558citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

558 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Gut microbes · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Predicting Enzyme Turnover Numbers and Enabling Rational Enzyme Evolution.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A simple probabilistic AlphaFold interaction score.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. When can AlphaFold predict the oligomeric states of proteins?Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2026
    Article

498 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Patrick Bryant *Science for Life Laboratory, 172 21, Solna, Sweden. patrick.bryant@scilifelab.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3439-1866
Gabriele Pozzati *Science for Life Laboratory, 172 21, Solna, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4303-9939
Arne ElofssonScience for Life Laboratory, 172 21, Solna, Sweden. arne@bioinfo.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7115-9751

Funding

Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse (Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation) COVID 19
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predicting the structure of interacting protein chains is a fundamental step towards understanding protein function. Unfortunately, no computational method can produce accurate structures of protein complexes. AlphaFold2, has shown unprecedented levels of accuracy in modelling single chain protein structures. Here, we apply AlphaFold2 for the prediction of heterodimeric protein complexes. We find that the AlphaFold2 protocol together with optimised multiple sequence alignments, generate models with acceptable quality (DockQ ≥ 0.23) for 63% of the dimers. From the predicted interfaces we create a simple function to predict the DockQ score which distinguishes acceptable from incorrect models as well as interacting from non-interacting proteins with state-of-art accuracy. We find that, using the predicted DockQ scores, we can identify 51% of all interacting pairs at 1% FPR.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyProteinsProtein ConformationProteins

Identifiers

PMID35273146
PMCPMC8913741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.